Failure to Detect Mismatches Between Intention and Outcome in a Simple Decision Task

@article{Johansson2005FailureTD,
  title={Failure to Detect Mismatches Between Intention and Outcome in a Simple Decision Task},
  author={P. Johansson and Lars Hall and S. Sikstr{\"o}m and A. Olsson},
  journal={Science},
  year={2005},
  volume={310},
  pages={116 - 119}
}
A fundamental assumption of theories of decision-making is that we detect mismatches between intention and outcome, adjust our behavior in the face of error, and adapt to changing circumstances. Is this always the case? We investigated the relation between intention, choice, and introspection. Participants made choices between presented face pairs on the basis of attractiveness, while we covertly manipulated the relationship between choice and outcome that they experienced. Participants failed… Expand
Memory distorions resulting from a choice blindness task
Correction of Manipulated Responses in the Choice Blindness Paradigm: What are the Predictors?
Is the Emotional Dog Blind to Its Choices?
Memory distortions resulting from a choice blindness task
A Simple Task Uncovers a Postdictive Illusion of Choice
Choice Blindness in Financial Decision Making
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 52 REFERENCES
The intentional stance
The illusion of conscious will
Change blindness: past, present, and future
Intentional action: Conscious experience and neural prediction
...
1
2
3
4
5
...