Facts, Ends, and Normative Reasons

@article{Lillehammer2010FactsEA,
  title={Facts, Ends, and Normative Reasons},
  author={Hallvard Lillehammer},
  journal={The Journal of Ethics},
  year={2010},
  volume={14},
  pages={17-26}
}
This paper is about the relationship between two widely accepted and apparently conflicting claims about how we should understand the notion of ‘reason giving’ invoked in theorising about reasons for action. According to the first claim, reasons are given by facts about the situation of agents. According to the second claim, reasons are given by ends. I argue that the apparent conflict between these two claims is less deep than is generally recognised. 
3 Citations
Worldly Reasons: An Ontological Inquiry into Motivating Considerations and Normative Reasons
In this article I advocate a worldly account of normative reasons according to which there is an ontological gap between these and the premises of practical thought, i.e. motivating considerations.
What distinguishes the practice-dependent approach to justice?
The practice-dependent approach to justice has received a lot of attention in post-millennium political philosophy. It has been developed in different directions and its normative implications have
A World Without Reasons: From Moral to Metanormative Error Theory
...................................................................................................................................... IV ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 33 REFERENCES
Ethics and Practical Reason
Introduction Deciding how to Decide On the Hypothetical and Non-Hypothetical in Reasoning about Action Humean Doubts about the Practical Justification of Morality Practical Theory Moral Judgement and
Analytical Dispositionalism and Practical Reason
The paper examines the plausibility of analytical dispositionalism about practical reason, according to which the following claims are conceptual truths about common sense ethical discourse: i)
Practical Reason and Norms
Practical Reason and Norms focuses on three problems: In what way are rules normative, and how do they differ from ordinary reasons? What makes normative systems systematic? What distinguishes legal
Reasons and Persons
This book challenges, with several powerful arguments, some of our deepest beliefs about rationality, morality, and personal identity. The author claims that we have a false view of our own nature;
Towards Justice and Virtue: A Constructive Account of Practical Reasoning
1. Overview: justice against virtue? 2. Practical reason: abstraction and construction 3. Focus: action, intelligibility and principles 4. Scope: agents and subjects: who counts? 5. Structure:
Reason and Value: Themes From the Moral Philosophy of Joseph Raz
1. Shared Valuing and Frameworks for Practical Reasoning 2. Reasons 3. Can Desires Provide Reasons for Action? 4. Enticing Reasons 5. Disengaging Reason 6. Raz on Values and Reasons 7. The Truth in
Why Be Rational
Normativity involves two kinds of relation. On the one hand, there is the relation of being a reason for. This is a relation between a fact and an attitude. On the other hand, there are relations
The authority of reason
This challenging and provocative book argues against much contemporary orthodoxy in philosophy and the social sciences by showing why objectivity in the domain of ethics is really no different from
Creating the Kingdom of Ends
Part I. Kant's Moral Philosophy: 1. An introduction to the ethical, political, and religious thought of Kant 2. Kant's analysis of obligation: the argument of Groundwork I 3. Kant's formula of
What We Owe to Each Other
TLDR
This chapter discusses Williams on Internal and External Reasons, as well as the Structure of Contractualism and Responsibility Promises, and the Foundations of Relativism.
...
1
2
3
4
...