Facilitated Communication Since 1995: A Review of Published Studies

@article{Mostert2001FacilitatedCS,
  title={Facilitated Communication Since 1995: A Review of Published Studies},
  author={Mark P. Mostert},
  journal={Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders},
  year={2001},
  volume={31},
  pages={287-313}
}
  • M. Mostert
  • Published 1 June 2001
  • Psychology
  • Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Previous reviews of Facilitated Communication (FC) studies have clearly established that proponents' claims are largely unsubstantiated and that using FC as an intervention for communicatively impaired or noncommunicative individuals is not recommended. However, while FC is less prominent than in the recent past, investigations of the technique's efficacy continue. This review examines published FC studies since the previous major reviews by Jacobson, Mulick, and Schwartz (1995) and Simpson and… 
Facilitated Communication and Its Legitimacy—Twenty-First Century Developments
By 2001, Facilitated Communication (FC) had largely been empirically discredited as an effective intervention for previously uncommunicative persons with disabilities, especially those with autism
Facilitated Communication Denies People With Disabilities Their Voice
Facilitated Communication (FC) has been rebranded as “supported typing” and repackaged as rapid prompting method, but remains a disproven intervention for people with disabilities. Despite the
An Activist Approach to Debunking FC
Facilitated Communication (FC), a controversial educational intervention touted for persons with autism and other non-communicative conditions, has reemerged as a viable educational option despite a
The Controversy Surrounding Facilitated Communication
Facilitated communication, long ago debunked, is a method that has been used with people with CCN to type messages. A “facilitator” uses physical prompts to assist the person to type or touch a
Does Linguistic Analysis Confirm the Validity of Facilitated Communication?
Facilitated communication (FC) has been interpreted as an ideomotor phenomenon, in which one person physically supports another person’s hand and unconsciously affects the content of the writing.
Understanding facilitated communication: Lessons from a former facilitator—Comments on Boynton, 2012
The discussion about facilitated communication is mainly about the origin of the messages produced—that is, whether they originated in the disabled person or the facilitator. The article by Boynton
Understanding facilitated communication: Lessons from a former facilitator—Comments on Boynton, 2012
The discussion about facilitated communication is mainly about the origin of the messages produced—that is, whether they originated in the disabled person or the facilitator. The article by Boynton
Facilitated Communication and Authorship: A Systematic Review
TLDR
A synthesis of the extant peer-reviewed literature on the question of authorship in Facilitated Communication indicated unequivocal evidence for facilitator control: messages generated through FC are authored by the facilitators rather than the individuals with disabilities.
EBP Speakers Corner: A revised imperative for curbing the lie of facilitated communication
Abstract Lilienfield, Marshall, Todd, and Shane present a useful portrait of the continued promulgation of facilitated communication (FC) as an effective intervention for persons with severe autism
Systematic review of facilitated communication 2014–2018 finds no new evidence that messages delivered using facilitated communication are authored by the person with disability
TLDR
A systematic review of the literature on FC published between 2014 and 2018 found no new studies on authorship and there remains no evidence that FC is a valid form of communication for individuals with severe communication disabilities.
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 67 REFERENCES
Further negative findings on facilitated communication
To date, most studies of the efficacy of Facilitated Communication (FC) have been hampered by small samples, limited experience of the subjects with the FC, and diagnostically narrow samples. The
Validation of Facilitated Communication
This study reports the results of an attempt to validate a young adult's use of facilitated communication. The individual, Philip, had made allegations of sexual abuse against his father. These
A case study: Follow-up assessment of facilitated communication
TLDR
Results indicated that the individual did not engage in any validated FC, that performance was equivalent on food and nonfood trials, and that PECS was the preferred mode of communication, yielding 100% accuracy in a message-passing, object identification task.
Facilitated communication: Better education through applied ideology
Facilitated communication (FC), or the provision of graduated assistance by staff in the selection of keys on a communication device by people with developmental disabilities, has become a widely
Facilitator influence in facilitated communication
The use of facilitated communication with individuals with autism has generated considerable controversy over the past several years. Only recently has research begun appearing which examines the
Facilitated communication: a response by child protection.
Facilitated communication: rejected in science, accepted in court-a case study and analysis of the use of FC evidence under Frye and Daubert.
  • B. Gorman
  • Psychology
    Behavioral sciences & the law
  • 1999
TLDR
This article traces the phenomenon of facilitated communication from its introduction to the United States in 1990 to its use in recent court proceedings and analyzes the future of FC in those states that have adopted the newer Daubert standard for scientific evidence.
How Teachers Confirm the Authorship of Facilitated Communication: A Portfolio Approach
Facilitated communication has been characterized as an alternative to speech that involves providing physical and emotional support to individuals with severe communication impairments as they type
Facilitated communicators' performance on a task of receptive language
TLDR
Results did not validate the use of FC for the administration of the PPVT-R nor did they show any notable advantage of one mode of input over another, and the effect of mode ofinputauditory or visual-on subjects' performance was investigated.
Investigation of the validity of facilitated communication through the disclosure of unknown information.
TLDR
Three individuals with diagnoses of autism and mental retardation participated in a message-passing format to determine whether they could disclose information previously unknown to their facilitators, suggesting that a phenomena as complex as facilitated communication eludes a cursory exploration.
...
...