Exploring the cognitive infrastructure of communication

@inproceedings{Ruiter2010ExploringTC,
  title={Exploring the cognitive infrastructure of communication},
  author={Jan Peter de Ruiter and Matthijs Leendert Noordzij and Sarah Newman-Norlund and Roger D. Newman-Norlund and Peter Hagoort and Stephen C. Levinson and Ivan Toni},
  year={2010}
}
Human communication is often thought about in terms of transmitted messages in a conventional code like a language. But communication requires a specialized interactive intelligence. Senders have to be able to perform recipient design, while receivers need to be able to do intention recognition, knowing that recipient design has taken place. To study this interactive intelligence in the lab, we developed a new task that taps directly into the underlying abilities to communicate in the absence… 

Figures and Tables from this paper

Understanding understanding: A computational-level perspective

TLDR
It is found that the specificity of the observed trial-by-trial adjustments made by communicators is parsimoniously explained by perspective taking, but not by simple heuristics, suggesting that humans do have a computationally efficient way of taking beliefs and knowledge of a recipient into account.

Neural Correlates of Intentional Communication

TLDR
The characteristics of this predictive mechanism support the notion that human communicative abilities are distinct from both sensorimotor and linguistic processes.

Recipient design in human communication: simple heuristics or perspective taking?

TLDR
It is found that the specificity of the observed trial-by-trial adjustments made by communicators is parsimoniously explained by perspective taking, but not by simple heuristics, which suggests that humans do have a computationally efficient way of taking beliefs and knowledge of a recipient into account.

People infer communicative action through an expectation for efficient communication

Humans often communicate using body movements like winks, waves, and nods. However, it is unclear how we identify when someone’s physical actions are communicative. Given people’s propensity to

Neural mechanisms of communicative innovation

TLDR
Using magnetoencephalography, this work assess spectral, temporal, and spatial characteristics of neural activity evoked when people generate and understand novel shared symbols during live communicative interactions and finds shared neuronal up-regulation was spatially localized to the right temporal lobe and the ventromedial prefrontal cortex and emerged already before the occurrence of a specific communicative problem.

Language in Interaction: The Role of Conscious Processes in Conversation

Consistent with the well-established tradition of cognitive pragmatics, this work hinges on the idea that human communication has to be considered inferential in nature. Starting from the

Neural Insights into the Relation between Language and Communication

TLDR
It is indicated that communicative abilities are best considered as neurally distinct from language abilities, based upon evidence showing that humans rely on different cortical systems when designing a communicative message for someone else as compared to when performing core linguistic tasks.

Understanding communicative actions: A repetitive TMS study

The computational costs of recipient design and intention recognition in communication

TLDR
It is shown that communicators performing recipient design inherit the computational load of their addressees, and thus, recipient design in itself cannot explain the speed of everyday human intentional communication.

Cerebral coherence between communicators marks the emergence of meaning

TLDR
Using coherence spectral-density analysis of cerebral activity simultaneously measured in pairs of communicators, this study shows that establishing mutual understanding of novel signals synchronizes cerebral dynamics across communicators’ right temporal lobes, favor the notion that meaning emerges from shared conceptualizations of a signal’s use.
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 45 REFERENCES

An Experimental Study of the Emergence of Human Communication Systems

TLDR
Communication systems emerged and developed rapidly during the games, integrating the use of explicit signs with information implicitly available to players and silent behavior-coordinating procedures, suggesting sign forms are perceptually distinct, easy to produce, and tolerant to variations.

On the origin of intentions

Any model of motor control or sensorimotor transformations starts from an intention to trigger a cascade of neural computations, yet how intentions themselves are generated remains a mystery. Part of

Experiments on the emergence of human communication

  • L. Steels
  • Psychology
    Trends in Cognitive Sciences
  • 2006

Saying what you mean in dialogue: A study in conceptual and semantic co-ordination

On the human ‘interactional engine’

<A> Introduction My goal in this paper is, first, to collect together a number of themes and observations that have usually been kept apart, locked up in their respective disciplines. When these are

SLOT: A research platform for investigating multimodal communication

TLDR
The usefulness of the spatial logistics task (SLOT) platform for conducting multimodal communication research in both human-human and human-computer interactions is demonstrated.

Contributing to Discourse

TLDR
A model of contributions is described as parts of collective acts performed by the participants working together and it is shown how it accounts for o variety of features of everyday conversations.

Roots of Human Sociality

* Introduction: Human Sociality as a New Interdisciplinary Field N.J. Enfield and Stepehn C. Levinson * Part 1: Properties of Human Interaction * On the Human 'Interaction Engine' Stephen C. Levinson

The Hcrc Map Task Corpus

TLDR
A corpus of unscripted, task-oriented dialogues which has been designed, digitally recorded, and transcribed to support the study of spontaneous speech on many levels is described.