Explanation and description in computational neuroscience

@article{Kaplan2011ExplanationAD,
  title={Explanation and description in computational neuroscience},
  author={David M. Kaplan},
  journal={Synthese},
  year={2011},
  volume={183},
  pages={339-373}
}
The central aim of this paper is to shed light on the nature of explanation in computational neuroscience. I argue that computational models in this domain possess explanatory force to the extent that they describe the mechanisms responsible for producing a given phenomenon—paralleling how other mechanistic models explain. Conceiving computational explanation as a species of mechanistic explanation affords an important distinction between computational models that play genuine explanatory roles… CONTINUE READING
Highly Influential
This paper has highly influenced 10 other papers. REVIEW HIGHLY INFLUENTIAL CITATIONS
Highly Cited
This paper has 47 citations. REVIEW CITATIONS
Recent Discussions
This paper has been referenced on Twitter 6 times over the past 90 days. VIEW TWEETS
34 Citations
28 References
Similar Papers

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 28 references

The limits of mechanistic explanation in neurocognitive sciences

  • A. M. 583–601. Rusanen, O. Lappi
  • 2007
Highly Influential
5 Excerpts

Ion channels of excitable membranes

  • B. New York Free Press. Hille
  • Nature
  • 2001
Highly Influential
8 Excerpts

Role functions, mechanisms, and hierarchy

  • C F.
  • Biophysical Journal,
  • 2001
Highly Influential
8 Excerpts

Aspects of scientific explanation and other essays in the philosophy of science

  • C. G. 215–226. Hempel
  • 1965
Highly Influential
4 Excerpts

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…