Explaining the effectiveness of fear extinction through latent-cause inference

@article{Song2021ExplainingTE,
  title={Explaining the effectiveness of fear extinction through latent-cause inference},
  author={Mingyu Song and Carolyn E. Jones and Marie H Monfils and Yael Niv},
  journal={Neurons, Behavior, Data analysis, and Theory},
  year={2021}
}
Acquiring fear responses to predictors of aversive outcomes is crucial for survival. At the same time, it is important to be able to modify such associations when they are maladaptive, for instance in treating anxiety and trauma-related disorders. Standard extinction procedures can reduce fear temporarily, but with sufficient delay or with reminders of the aversive experience, fear often returns. The latent-cause inference framework explains the return of fear by presuming that animals learn a… 

Figures from this paper

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 59 REFERENCES
Gradual extinction prevents the return of fear: implications for the discovery of state
TLDR
In two Pavlovian fear-conditioning experiments, it is shown that gradually reducing the frequency of aversive stimuli, rather than eliminating them abruptly, prevents the recovery of fear.
Different mechanisms of fear extinction dependent on length of time since fear acquisition.
TLDR
Data support a model in which different neural mechanisms are recruited depending on the temporal delay of fear extinction, and suggest that extinction initiated shortly following fear acquisition preferentially engages depotentiation/"unlearning," whereas extinction initiated at longer delays recruits a different mechanism.
Building physiological toughness: Some aversive events during extinction may attenuate return of fear.
Shifting from fear to safety through deconditioning-update
TLDR
The results indicate that deconditioning-update is more effective than traditional extinction in reducing fear responses; moreover, such effects are long lasting and resistant to renewal and spontaneous recovery.
Context, learning, and extinction.
TLDR
It is shown that online Bayesian inference within a model that assumes an unbounded number of latent causes can characterize a diverse set of behavioral results from such manipulations, some of which pose problems for the model of Redish et al. (2007).
Gradual extinction reduces reinstatement
TLDR
The results suggest that the GE process is suitable for increasing the efficacy of fear extinction, and significantly reduced the return of fear in the reinstatement test for the startle response but not for SCR or contingency ratings.
Context and behavioral processes in extinction.
  • M. Bouton
  • Psychology, Biology
    Learning & memory
  • 2004
TLDR
Evidence that extinction does not destroy the original learning, but instead generates new learning that is especially context-dependent is reviewed, consistent with behavioral models that emphasize the role of generalization decrement and expectation violation.
Spacing extinction trials alleviates renewal and spontaneous recovery
TLDR
The results suggest that extinction is more enduring when the extinction trials are spaced rather than massed, and that less spontaneous recovery of fear after spaced than after massed extinction trials.
Reinstatement of fear to an extinguished conditioned stimulus.
  • R. Rescorla, C. Heth
  • Psychology, Biology
    Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes
  • 1975
Four experiments are reported which demonstrate the ability of an unconditioned stimulus (UCS) presentation following extinction to partially reinstate the conditioned response. These experiments are
...
...