Explaining mutualism variation: a new evolutionary paradox?

@article{Heath2014ExplainingMV,
  title={Explaining mutualism variation: a new evolutionary paradox?},
  author={Katy D Heath and John R Stinchcombe},
  journal={Evolution; international journal of organic evolution},
  year={2014},
  volume={68 2},
  pages={309-17}
}
The paradox of mutualism is typically framed as the persistence of interspecific cooperation, despite the potential advantages of cheating. Thus, mutualism research has tended to focus on stabilizing mechanisms that prevent the invasion of low-quality partners. These mechanisms alone cannot explain the persistence of variation for partner quality observed in nature, leaving a large gap in our understanding of how mutualisms evolve. Studying partner quality variation is necessary for applying… CONTINUE READING
Highly Cited
This paper has 50 citations. REVIEW CITATIONS
Related Discussions
This paper has been referenced on Twitter 21 times. VIEW TWEETS

From This Paper

Figures, tables, and topics from this paper.

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 26 extracted citations

Fitness variation among host species and the paradox of ineffective rhizobia.

Journal of evolutionary biology • 2018
View 5 Excerpts
Highly Influenced

Evolutionary models of mutualism *

View 1 Excerpt
Highly Influenced

Mutualisms and Insect Conservation

Springer International Publishing • 2017
View 1 Excerpt

51 Citations

01020'14'15'16'17'18'19
Citations per Year
Semantic Scholar estimates that this publication has 51 citations based on the available data.

See our FAQ for additional information.

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 16 references

Community genetics: what have we accomplished and where should we be going?

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences • 2011
View 3 Excerpts

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…