Expert witness perceptions of bias in experts.

@article{Commons2004ExpertWP,
  title={Expert witness perceptions of bias in experts.},
  author={Michael Lamport Commons and Patrice Marie Miller and Thomas Gordon Gutheil},
  journal={The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law},
  year={2004},
  volume={32 1},
  pages={70-5}
}
A pilot study of perceptions of different sources of expert bias, as well as of personal investment in case outcomes, was performed among attendees at a workshop at an annual meeting of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law. Participants were asked to rate hypothetical responses by experts to various case outcomes and the biasing potential of different kinds of situations for opposing or other experts. A factor analysis produced two factors. Factor 1 included questions about situations… CONTINUE READING

From This Paper

Figures, tables, and topics from this paper.

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 12 extracted citations

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 14 references

Issues in forensic counter transference: early warning signs of compromised distance and objectivity

  • TG Gutheil
  • 2002

Mastering forensic psychiatric practice: advanced strategies for the expert witness

  • TG Gutheil, RI Simon
  • American Psychiatric Publishing,
  • 2002

Emotions overriding forensic opinions?— the potentially biasing effect of victim statements

  • E Lynette, R Rogers
  • J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 28:449–57,
  • 2000

Studying the Clinician: Judgment Research and Psy chological Assessment

  • HN Garb
  • American Psychological Association,
  • 1998

Signal Detection Theory and ROC Analysis in Psychology and Diagnostics: Collected Papers

  • JA Swets
  • Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum,
  • 1996

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…