Expert Status and Performance

@inproceedings{Burgman2011ExpertSA,
  title={Expert Status and Performance},
  author={Mark Burgman and Marissa F McBride and Raquel Ashton and Andrew Speirs-Bridge and Louisa Flander and Bonnie C Wintle and Fiona Fidler and Libby Rumpff and Charles Twardy},
  booktitle={PloS one},
  year={2011}
}
Expert judgements are essential when time and resources are stretched or we face novel dilemmas requiring fast solutions. Good advice can save lives and large sums of money. Typically, experts are defined by their qualifications, track record and experience. The social expectation hypothesis argues that more highly regarded and more experienced experts will give better advice. We asked experts to predict how they will perform, and how their peers will perform, on sets of questions. The results… CONTINUE READING
Recent Discussions
This paper has been referenced on Twitter 19 times over the past 90 days. VIEW TWEETS
22 Citations
31 References
Similar Papers

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 22 extracted citations

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 31 references

Experts in uncertainty: opinion and subjective probability in science

  • RM Cooke
  • 1991
Highly Influential
8 Excerpts

Procedures guide for structured expert judgement in accident consequence modelling

  • RM Cooke, Goossens
  • LHJ
  • 2000
Highly Influential
5 Excerpts

Rethinking expertise

  • HM Collins, R Evans
  • 2007
2 Excerpts

Risks and decisions for conservation and environmental management

  • MA Burgman
  • 2005
1 Excerpt

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…