Experimental joint weak measurement on a photon pair as a probe of Hardy's paradox.

  title={Experimental joint weak measurement on a photon pair as a probe of Hardy's paradox.},
  author={Jeff S Lundeen and Adam M. Steinberg},
  journal={Physical review letters},
  volume={102 2},
It has been proposed that the ability to perform joint weak measurements on postselected systems would allow us to study quantum paradoxes. These measurements can investigate the history of those particles that contribute to the paradoxical outcome. Here we experimentally perform weak measurements of joint (i.e., nonlocal) observables. In an implementation of Hardy's paradox, we weakly measure the locations of two photons, the subject of the conflicting statements behind the paradox. Remarkably… 

Figures and Tables from this paper

Direct observation of Hardy's paradox by joint weak measurement with an entangled photon pair
We implemented a joint weak measurement of the trajectories of two photons in a photonic version of Hardy's experiment. The joint weak measurement has been performed via an entangled meter state in
Testing Bell's inequality with one-party weak measurements
This work proposes a framework to test Bell's inequality in a bipartite system with only local operations made by one of the parties, and shows the importance of the use of pointer states endowed with orbital angular momentum in the present case.
Weak value tomography of strong quantum measurements
As shown in Aharonov (Phys Rev A 72(5):052111, 2005), in an arbitrary-strength quantum measurement performed on a pre- and post-selected system, the quantum state that describes the conditional
Quantum discord with weak measurement operators of quasi-Werner states based on bipartite entangled coherent states
Among many applications quantum weak measurements have been shown to be important in exploring fundamental physics issues, such as the experimental violation of the Heisenberg uncertainty relation
A weak values approach for testing simultaneous Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen elements of reality for non-commuting observables
In questioning the completeness of quantum mechanics, Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen (EPR) claimed that from the outcomes of local experiments performed on an entangled system, it was possible to ascribe
Theory and experiment for resource-efficient joint weak-measurement
Incompatible observables underlie pillars of quantum physics such as contextuality and entanglement. The Heisenberg uncertainty principle is a fundamental limitation on the measurement of the product
Hardy's paradox tested in the spin-orbit Hilbert space of single photons
We test experimentally the quantum ``paradox'' proposed by Lucien Hardy in 1993 [Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1665 (1993)] by using single photons instead of photon pairs. This is achieved by addressing two
On Interchangeability of Probe–Object Roles in Quantum–Quantum Interaction-Free Measurement
In this paper we examine Interaction-free measurement where both the probe and the object are quantum particles. We argue that in this case the description of the measurement procedure must by
Complete characterization of post-selected quantum statistics using weak measurement tomography
The reconstruction of quantum states from a sufficient set of experimental data can be achieved with arbitrarily weak measurement interactions. Since such weak measurements have negligible back
Neutron optical test of the quantum commutator relation through imaginary weak values
The canonical commutation relation is the hallmark of quantum theory and Heisenberg's uncertainty relation is a direct consequence of it. But despite its fundamental role in quantum theory,


Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics
Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics was a revolutionary book that caused a sea change in theoretical physics. Here, John von Neumann, one of the leading mathematicians of the twentieth
  • Rev. Lett. 68, 2981
  • 1992
  • C. Ross
  • Medicine
    The Dental register
  • 1869
  • Rev. Lett. 66, 1107 (1991); K. J. Resch, J. S. Lundeen, and A.M. Steinberg, Phys. Lett. A 324, 125 (2004); R. Mir et al., New J. Phys. 9, 287 (2007); O. Hosten and P. Kwiat, Science 319, 787
  • 2008
Nature (London) 409
  • 46
  • 2001
Nature 409
  • 46
  • 2001
and N
  • Imotoar, arXiv:0811.1625v1. TABLE II. The weak values for the arm occupations in Hardy’s paradox. NðIEÞ NðOEÞ NðIPÞ 0:245 0:068 [0] 0:641 0:083 [1] 0:926 0:015 [1] NðOPÞ 0:719 0:074 [1] 0:759 0:083 [ 1] 0:078 0:02 [0] 0:924 0:024 [1] 0:087 0:023 [0] PRL 102, 020404
  • 2009
  • Rev. Lett. 87, 123603 (2001); K. J. Resch, J. S. Lundeen, and A.M. Steinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 037904 (2002); T. J. Herzog et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 629
  • 1994
  • Rev. Lett. 86, 5188
  • 2001
  • Lett. A 292, 151
  • 2001