Experimental design and data analysis in receiver operating characteristic studies: lessons learned from reports in radiology from 1997 to 2006.

@article{Shiraishi2009ExperimentalDA,
  title={Experimental design and data analysis in receiver operating characteristic studies: lessons learned from reports in radiology from 1997 to 2006.},
  author={Junji Shiraishi and Lorenzo L. Pesce and Charles E. Metz and Kunio Doi},
  journal={Radiology},
  year={2009},
  volume={253 3},
  pages={
          822-30
        }
}
  • Junji Shiraishi, Lorenzo L. Pesce, +1 author Kunio Doi
  • Published in Radiology 2009
  • Medicine
  • PURPOSE To provide a broad perspective concerning the recent use of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis in medical imaging by reviewing ROC studies published in Radiology between 1997 and 2006 for experimental design, imaging modality, medical condition, and ROC paradigm. MATERIALS AND METHODS Two hundred ninety-five studies were obtained by conducting a literature search with PubMed with two criteria: publication in Radiology between 1997 and 2006 and occurrence of the phrase… CONTINUE READING

    Create an AI-powered research feed to stay up to date with new papers like this posted to ArXiv

    Citations

    Publications citing this paper.
    SHOWING 1-10 OF 26 CITATIONS

    Radiological images and machine learning: trends, perspectives, and prospects

    VIEW 1 EXCERPT
    CITES BACKGROUND

    QoS and QoE Enhanced Resource Allocation for Wireless Video Sensor Networks Using Hybrid Optimization Algorithm

    VIEW 1 EXCERPT
    CITES BACKGROUND

    Verification of modified receiver-operating characteristic software using simulated rating data

    VIEW 1 EXCERPT
    CITES BACKGROUND

    References

    Publications referenced by this paper.
    SHOWING 1-10 OF 28 REFERENCES

    ROC analysis in medical imaging: a tutorial review of the literature

    • Charles E. Metz
    • Medicine, Computer Science
    • Radiological physics and technology
    • 2008

    On the benefits and harms of screening for breast cancer.

    VIEW 1 EXCERPT

    Reader Variability in Mammography and Its Implications for Expected Utility over the Population of Readers and Cases

    VIEW 1 EXCERPT