Expanding the scope of sentencing research: Determinants of juvenile and adult punishment in the Netherlands

@article{Wermink2015ExpandingTS,
  title={Expanding the scope of sentencing research: Determinants of juvenile and adult punishment in the Netherlands},
  author={Hilde Wermink and Brian David Johnson and Paul Nieuwbeerta and Jan W. de Keijser},
  journal={European Journal of Criminology},
  year={2015},
  volume={12},
  pages={739 - 768}
}
Research on legal and extralegal disparity in criminal sentencing has been conducted primarily in the United States, and, to a lesser extent, in select European nations. Largely separate research literatures have developed around juvenile and adult sentencing decisions, and few studies examine both prosecutorial and judicial punishment outcomes. This study examines the effects of diverse legal and socio-demographic characteristics on both prosecutorial and judicial punishments, for both… 

Tables from this paper

Paying Money for Freedom: Effects of Monetary Compensation on Sentencing for Criminal Traffic Offenses in China
Objectives The current study seeks to understand the role that monetary compensation plays on the joint occurrence of imprisonment and probation for criminal traffic offenses in China. We argue that
Neighborhoods, Criminal Incidents, Race, and Sentencing: Exploring the Racial and Social Context of Disparities in Incarceration Sentences
As an extra-legal factor, social context is a key contributor to racial/ethnic disparities in incarceration sentences. Neighborhoods may have important, yet underexplored influences on sentencing.
Investigating sentence severity with judicial open data - A case study on sentencing high-tech crime in the Dutch criminal justice system
TLDR
The most important results are, firstly, that offenders who use advanced ICT are sentenced to longer custodial sentences compared to other offenders, and secondly, the quality of sentencing research with open data is comparable to thequality of sentencingResearch with judicial databases, which are not anonymised.
Investigating sentence severity with judicial open data
Open data promotes transparency and accountability as everyone can analyse it. Law enforcement and the judiciary are increasingly making data available, to increase trust and confidence in the
Exploring gender disparities in the prosecution of theft cases: Propensity score matching on data from German court files
This article engages in the discussion about gender disparities in prosecutorial decision-making. Appling propensity score matching after multiple imputation on data drawn from case files, the arti...
Voorlopige hechtenis van jeugdigen in uitvoering
In dit exploratieve kwantitatieve onderzoek wordt een beeld geschetst van de voorlopige hechtenispraktijk in jeugdstrafzaken en de kenmerken van de betrokken jeugdige verdachten. In dit onderzoek
Pretrial Detention and Incarceration Decisions for Foreign Nationals: a Mixed-Methods Approach
An increase in the mobility of persons across national borders coincides with an overrepresentation of foreign nationals in the penal systems of Western Europe, though this phenomenon is not yet well
Sex, Age, Education, Marital Status, Number of Children, and Employment – the Impact of Extralegal Factors on Sentencing Disparities
Countries that have judicial discretion in their legal system usually struggle with sentencing disparities. This is no different in Poland. The current study examined whether extralegal factors such
The Criminal Case Processing of Foreign Nationals in the Netherlands
Foreign nationals are increasingly encountering the criminal justice institutions of many European countries. Yet, basic questions about how they are punished within these institutions,
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 68 REFERENCES
SENTENCING HOMICIDE OFFENDERS IN THE NETHERLANDS: OFFENDER, VICTIM, AND SITUATIONAL INFLUENCES IN CRIMINAL PUNISHMENT†
Empirical investigations of criminal sentencing represent a vast research enterprise in criminology. However, this research has been restricted almost exclusively to U.S. contexts, and often it
THE JUVENILE PENALTY: A COMPARISON OF JUVENILE AND YOUNG ADULT SENTENCING OUTCOMES IN CRIMINAL COURT*
This study uses criminal court data from the Pennsylvania Commission on Sentencing (PCS) to investigate the sentencing of juvenile offenders processed in adult criminal court by comparing their
Structure and Practice of Familial-Based Justice in a Criminal Court
Many explanations have been proposed for gender differences in criminal court outcomes, but none has been grounded in a systematic study of the reasoning processes used by court officials in
GENDER AND IMPRISONMENT DECISIONS
Guidelines sentencing data from Pennsylvania for the years 1985–1987 are analyzed to assess the influence of gender on judges' imprisonment decisions. These data provide detailed information on
The interaction of race, gender, and age in criminal sentencing: The punishment cost of being young, black, and male
Prior theory and research on sentencing oversimplify the role of race, gender and age in judicial decision making. In this article we present a “focal concerns” theory of judicial decision making to
Sentencing and Sanctions in Western Countries
This collection of original essays surveys the evolution of sentencing policies and practices in Western countries over the past twenty-five years. The volume consists of approximately ten essays.
Racial Disparities in the Punishment of Youth: A Theoretical and Empirical Assessment of the Literature
Findings from research on racial disparities in juvenile justice outcomes are mixed and the causes of minority overrepresentation in juvenile justice remain unclear. This study systematically
Explaining Ethnic Inequality in the Juvenile Justice System An Analysis of the Outcomes of Dutch Prosecutorial Decision Making
Most studies of the treatment of minorities in criminal justice systems show that ethnic minorities are punished more harshly. This paper aims to explain ethnic inequality in prosecutorial decision
Offender’s Personal Circumstances and Punishment: Toward a More Refined Model for the Explanation of Sentencing Disparities
Prior research suggests that offender sex, age, and race are often influential determinants of sentencing outcomes. According to focal concerns theory, they affect sentencing because—due to limited
Gender, crime, and punishment
Are men and women who are prosecuted for similar crimes punished differently? If it is true, as is commonly assumed, that women are sentenced more leniently than men, does this tendency vary by class
...
...