Expanded screening for HIV in the United States--an analysis of cost-effectiveness.

  title={Expanded screening for HIV in the United States--an analysis of cost-effectiveness.},
  author={A. David Paltiel and Milton C. Weinstein and April D. Kimmel and George R. Seage and Elena Losina and Hong Zhang and Kenneth A. Freedberg and Rochelle P. Walensky},
  journal={The New England journal of medicine},
  volume={352 6},
BACKGROUND Although the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommend routine HIV counseling, testing, and referral (HIVCTR) in settings with at least a 1 percent prevalence of HIV, roughly 280,000 Americans are unaware of their human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. The effect of expanded screening for HIV is unknown in the era of effective antiretroviral therapy. METHODS We developed a computer simulation model of HIV screening and treatment to compare routine, voluntary… CONTINUE READING
Highly Influential
This paper has highly influenced 12 other papers. REVIEW HIGHLY INFLUENTIAL CITATIONS
Recent Discussions
This paper has been referenced on Twitter 3 times over the past 90 days. VIEW TWEETS


Publications citing this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 231 extracted citations


Publications referenced by this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 25 references

The high yield of routine HIV screening in urgent care sites in Massachusetts

  • RP Walensky, E Losina, L Malatesta
  • Am J Public Health 2005;95:71-3
  • 2005

Race/ethnicity and gender differences in late HIV testing with HIV

  • M Campsmith, D. Burgess
  • Presented at the 2001 National HIV Prevention…
  • 2001

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…