Examining the testing effect with open‐ and closed‐book tests

  title={Examining the testing effect with open‐ and closed‐book tests},
  author={Pooja K. Agarwal and Jeffrey D. Karpicke and Sean H. K. Kang and Henry L. Roediger and Kathleen B. McDermott},
  journal={Applied Cognitive Psychology},
Two experiments examined the testing effect with open-book tests, in which students view notes and textbooks while taking the test, and closed-book tests, in which students take the test without viewing notes or textbooks. Subjects studied prose passages and then restudied or took an open- or closed-book test. Taking either kind of test, with feedback, enhanced long-term retention relative to conditions in which subjects restudied material or took a test without feedback. Open-book testing led… 

Figures and Tables from this paper

Expectancy of an open-book test decreases performance on a delayed closed-book test
Expected an open-book test decreased participants’ time spent studying and their delayed test performance on closed-book comprehension and transfer tests, demonstrating that test expectancy can influence long-term learning.
Testing Effect: A Further Examination of Open-Book and Closed-Book Test Formats.
Open-books tests are not inferior to closed-book tests in building knowledge and can be particularly useful in online classes because preventing cheating is difficult when closed- book tests are administered online.
Open-Book Versus Closed-Book Tests in University Classes: A Field Experiment
The present field study compared open-book testing and closed- book testing in two (parallel) introductory university courses in cognitive psychology, and found that the closed-book group performed better than the open- book group.
The Effect of Various Testing Conditions on Long-Term Retention of Reading Materials: The Case of Initial and Delayed Test Types, and Feedback on Test
This study investigated various testing conditions for their influence on long-term retention of reading materials. To do so, 84 English as Foreign Language (EFL) learners were randomly selected from
Rethinking the Use of Tests: A Meta-Analysis of Practice Testing
The testing effect is a well-known concept referring to gains in learning and retention that can occur when students take a practice test on studied material before taking a final test on the same
Knowing Is Not Half the Battle: the Role of Actual Test Experience in the Forward Testing Effect
Recent studies suggest that testing on prior material enhances subsequent learning of new material. Although such forward testing effect has received extensive empirical support, it is not yet clear
Open-book problem-solving in engineering: An exploratory study
The bulk of educational research exploring open-book examination demonstrates that the open-book format reduces student anxiety and promotes higher-level learning (i.e., reduces reliance upon rote
Cheat Sheet or Open-Book? A Comparison of the Effects of Exam Types on Performance, Retention, and Anxiety ∗
The differences between open-book, cheat sheet, and closed-book exams were examined in two different types of psychology courses. A total of 297 students enrolled in eight sections of Introductory
Testing pays off twice: Potentials of practice tests and feedback regarding exam performance and judgment accuracy
Two studies investigated the testing effects on performance and on metacognitive judgment accuracy in authentic learning settings. Across two educational psychology courses, undergraduate students


Generalizing test-enhanced learning from the laboratory to the classroom
Three experiments that extend the testing effect of brief articles, lectures, and materials in a college course to educationally relevant materials demonstrated a robust testing effect and revealed that an initial short-answer test produced greater gains on a final test than did an initial multiple-choice test.
Test format and corrective feedback modify the effect of testing on long-term retention
We investigated the effects of format of an initial test and whether or not students received corrective feedback on that test on a final test of retention 3 days later. In Experiment 1, subjects
Study Behavior in the Closed-Book and the Open-Book Examination: A Comparative Analysis
The study focused on students’ perceptions in order to find out the study behavior put forward by them prior to and during the exam in each of both the open-book and the closed-book exam
Testing the testing effect in the classroom
Laboratory studies show that taking a test on studied material promotes subsequent learning and retention of that material on a final test (termed the testing effect). Educational research has
Testing improves long-term retention in a simulated classroom setting
The benefits of testing on long-term retention of lecture material were examined in a simulated classroom setting. Participants viewed a series of three lectures on consecutive days and engaged in a
The Power of Testing Memory: Basic Research and Implications for Educational Practice
This article selectively review laboratory studies that reveal the power of testing in improving retention and then turns to studies that demonstrate the basic effects in educational settings, including the related concepts of dynamic testing and formative assessment.
The "Testing" Phenomenon: Not Gone but Nearly Forgotten
The "testing" phenomenon refers to the finding that students who take a test on material between the time they first study and the time they take a final test remember more of the material than
The effect of type and timing of feedback on learning from multiple-choice tests.
This research suggests that delaying the presentation of feedback after a test is beneficial to learning because of the spaced presentation of information.
When additional multiple‐choice lures aid versus hinder later memory
SUMMARY Three experiments were conducted to investigate whether increasing the number of lures on a multiple-choice test helps, hinders or has no effect on later memory. All three patterns have been