Examining the Effects of I-Sharing for Future White-Black Interactions

@article{Gaither2016ExaminingTE,
  title={Examining the Effects of I-Sharing for Future White-Black Interactions},
  author={Sarah E. Gaither and J{\'e}ssica L{\'u}cia dos Rem{\'e}dios and Jennifer R. Schultz and Keith B. Maddox and Samuel R. Sommers},
  journal={Social Psychology},
  year={2016},
  volume={47},
  pages={125-135}
}
Abstract. Research shows that I-sharing, or sharing subjective experiences with an outgroup member, positively shapes attitudes toward that outgroup member. We investigated whether this type of social experience would also promote a positive interracial interaction with a novel outgroup member. Results showed that White and Black participants who I-shared with a racial outgroup member (vs. I-sharing with a racial ingroup member) expressed more liking toward that outgroup member. However, I… 

Tables from this paper

Making I-Contact: Fostering Shared, In-the-moment Subjective Experiences

Numerous research studies have offered evidence that I-sharing (perceived subjective similarity) facilitates interpersonal connection (e.g. Huneke & Pinel, 2016; Pinel, Long, Landau, Alexander, &

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 44 REFERENCES

When I’s Meet

I-sharing may offer a way of improving attitudes toward outgroup members that still enables people to embrace their differing social identities, regardless of the I-sharer’s social identity.

Understanding the impact of cross-group friendship on interactions with novel outgroup members.

It is implied that cross-group friendship improves novel intergroup experiences to the degree that outgroups become associated with the self.

Disruptive effects of vigilance on dominant group members' treatment of outgroup members: choking versus shining under pressure.

Results were generally consistent with the hypothesis that evaluative concerns exert a disruptive effect on intimacy-building behaviors exhibited by dominant group members in intergroup interaction and regardless of whether individuals' orientation toward outgroup members was assessed in terms of prejudiced racial attitudes or racial ingroup identification.

When Prejudice Does Not Pay

The results are consistent with recently proposed resource models of self-regulation and executive control in that interracial interaction, a particularly taxing exercise ofSelf-regulation for highly prejudiced individuals, negatively affected performance on a subsequent, yet unrelated, test of executive function.

The Antecedents and Implications of Interracial Anxiety

A model of the antecedents and implications of intergroup anxiety is offered and it is argued that a lack of positive previous experiences with outgroup members creates negative expectancies about interracial interactions, which result in inter group anxiety.

Role of competition-induced anxiety in limiting the beneficial impact of positive behavior by an out-group member.

Results support the hypothesis that the expectation of an unpleasant competitive encounter with an out-group generates anxiety that, in turn, lessens the impact of positive behavior by anOut-group member.

Expecting To Be the Target of Prejudice: Implications for Interethnic Interactions

The more ethnic minorities expected Whites to be prejudiced, the more their White partners had positive experiences during interethnic interactions.

The extended contact effect: Knowledge of cross-group friendships and prejudice.

The extended contact hypothesis proposes that knowledge that an in-group member has a close relationship with an out-group member can lead to more positive intergroup attitudes. Proposed mechanisms

Interpersonal Concerns in Social Encounters between Majority and Minority Group Members

Dyadic interactions between Whites and Blacks were examined. Whites' concern about appearing prejudiced was manipulated by informing Whites that it was extremely important not to be prejudiced during

We're warmer (they're more competent): I-sharing and African Americans' perceptions of the ingroup and outgroup.

Examination of how experiences with individual ingroup and outgroup members affect these evaluations on two key dimensions in intergroup research: warmth and competence revealed an ingroup preference on the dimension of warmth when participants had I-shared with a fellow African American but not when they hadI- shared with a European American.