• Corpus ID: 239016140

Exact Bias Correction for Linear Adjustment of Randomized Controlled Trials

@inproceedings{Chang2021ExactBC,
  title={Exact Bias Correction for Linear Adjustment of Randomized Controlled Trials},
  author={Haoge Chang and Joel A. Middleton and Peter M. Aronow},
  year={2021}
}
In an influential critique of empirical practice, Freedman [Fre08a, Fre08b] showed that the linear regression estimator was biased for the analysis of randomized controlled trials under the randomization model. Under Freedman’s assumptions, we derive exact closed-form bias corrections for the linear regression estimator with and without treatment-by-covariate interactions. We show that the limiting distribution of the bias corrected estimator is identical to the uncorrected estimator, implying… 

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 54 REFERENCES
Agnostic notes on regression adjustments to experimental data: Reexamining Freedman's critique
Freedman [Adv. in Appl. Math. 40 (2008) 180-193; Ann. Appl. Stat. 2 (2008) 176-196] critiqued ordinary least squares regression adjustment of estimated treatment effects in randomized experiments,
Essays on Causal Inference in Randomized Experiments
This dissertation explores methodological topics in the analysis of randomized experiments, with a focus on weakening the assumptions of conventional models.Chapter 1 gives an overview of the
The LOOP Estimator: Adjusting for Covariates in Randomized Experiments
TLDR
This article proposes the “leave-one-out potential outcomes” estimator, a covariate adjustment method that allows for automatic variable selection, so that practitioners need not commit to any specific set of covariates prior to seeing the data.
The Econometrics of Randomized Experiments
TLDR
This chapter presents econometric and statistical methods for analyzing randomized experiments, and considers, in detail, estimation and inference for heterogenous treatment effects in settings with (possibly many) covariates.
On regression adjustments to experimental data
  • D. Freedman
  • Mathematics, Computer Science
    Adv. Appl. Math.
  • 2008
TLDR
This work evaluates results using Neyman's non-parametric model, where each subject has two potential responses, one if treated and the other if untreated, where only one of the two responses is observed.
On regression adjustments in experiments with several treatments
Regression adjustments are often made to experimental data. Since randomization does not justify the models, bias is likely; nor are the usual variance calculations to be trusted. Here, we evaluate
Adjusting treatment effect estimates by post-stratification in randomized experiments
Summary.  Experimenters often use post-stratification to adjust estimates. Post-stratification is akin to blocking, except that the number of treated units in each stratum is a random variable
A Class of Unbiased Estimators of the Average Treatment Effect in Randomized Experiments
Abstract We derive a class of design-based estimators for the average treatment effect that are unbiased whenever the treatment assignment process is known. We generalize these estimators to include
Limit Theorems for Regressions with Unequal and Dependent Errors
This paper deals with the asymptotic distribution of the vectorial least squares estimators (LSE) for the parameters in multiple linear regression systems. The regression constants are assumed to be
On equivalencies between design-based and regression-based variance estimators for randomized experiments
Abstract This paper demonstrates that the randomization-based “Neyman” and constant-effects estimators for the variance of estimated average treatment effects are equivalent to a variant of the White
...
1
2
3
4
5
...