Evolutionary escalation: the bat–moth arms race

@article{terHofstede2016EvolutionaryET,
  title={Evolutionary escalation: the bat–moth arms race},
  author={Hannah M. ter Hofstede and John M Ratcliffe},
  journal={Journal of Experimental Biology},
  year={2016},
  volume={219},
  pages={1589 - 1602}
}
ABSTRACT Echolocation in bats and high-frequency hearing in their insect prey make bats and insects an ideal system for studying the sensory ecology and neuroethology of predator–prey interactions. Here, we review the evolutionary history of bats and eared insects, focusing on the insect order Lepidoptera, and consider the evidence for antipredator adaptations and predator counter-adaptations. Ears evolved in a remarkable number of body locations across insects, with the original selection… Expand
Aerial Warfare: Have Bats and Moths Co-evolved?
TLDR
Evidence for reciprocity and specificity in the evolution of bat traits is confounded by the fact that these traits could also have evolved as adaptation for particular habitats and tasks, and these requirements might be met by stealth echolocation, especially where these involve evolutionary trade-offs. Expand
Neural representation of bat predation risk and evasive flight in moths: a modelling approach.
TLDR
This study shows that even a very simple sensory system can adapt to deliver information suitable for triggering appropriate defensive reactions to each predator in a multiple predator community. Expand
Neural representation of bat predation risk and evasive flight in moths: a modelling approach
TLDR
This study shows that even a very simple sensory system can adapt to deliver information suitable for triggering appropriate defensive reactions to each predator in a multiple predator community. Expand
Species-specific strategies increase unpredictability of escape flight in eared moths
TLDR
This work shows species-specific and size-independent differences in both overall flight strength and change of flight strength over time, confirming the escape-tactic diversity hypothesis for eared moths and shows strong inter-individual differences in evasive flight within some species. Expand
From Understory to Canopy: In situ Behavior of Neotropical Forest Katydids in Response to Bat Echolocation Calls
Predator-prey interactions take place in complex environments, and research on the sensory ecology of predator-detection relies on understanding when, where, and how prey experience and respond toExpand
What does an insect hear? Reassessing the role of hearing in predator avoidance with insights from vertebrate prey.
TLDR
Research on the role of insect hearing in predator avoidance has been disproportionally focused on bat-detection, and that acoustically-mediated responses to other predators may have been overlooked because the responses of prey may be subtle (e.g. ceasing activity, increasing vigilance). Expand
Species‐specific strategies increase unpredictability of escape flight in eared moths
TLDR
This work shows species‐specific and size‐independent differences in both overall flight strength and change of flight strength over time, supporting the escape‐tactic diversity hypothesis for eared moths and showing strong interindividual differences in evasive flight within some species. Expand
Convergent Evolution of Wingbeat-Powered Anti-Bat Ultrasound in the Microlepidoptera
Bats and moths provide a textbook example of predator-prey evolutionary arms races, demonstrating adaptations, and counter adaptations on both sides. The evolutionary responses of moths to theExpand
The influence of bat echolocation call duration and timing on auditory encoding of predator distance in noctuoid moths
TLDR
For short echolocation calls, a large range of sound levels cannot be coded by moth auditory receptor activity, resulting in no information about the distance of a bat, although differences in activity between ears might provide information about direction. Expand
Sheep in wolves’ clothing: prey rely on proactive defences when predator and non-predator cues are similar
TLDR
Neotropical katydid signalling illustrates a fascinating case where trophic interactions are probably mediated by a third group: bats with alternative foraging strategies (e.g. frugivory). Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 243 REFERENCES
Multimodal warning signals for a multiple predator world
TLDR
It is shown that warning signals of tiger moths vary according to the seasonal and daily activity patterns of birds and bats—predators with divergent sensory capacities; and it is suggested that the evolution of acoustic warning signals may lack the theoretical difficulties associated with the origination of conspicuous colouration. Expand
Nocturnal anti-predator adaptations in eared and earless Nearctic Lepidoptera
TLDR
It is reported that earless species fly less throughout the night than eared species, supporting the hypothesis that this behavior has evolved as a passive defense against the transient attacks of aerially foraging bats in insects that do not possess long-range auditory detection abilities. Expand
Tiger moths and the threat of bats: decision-making based on the activity of a single sensory neuron
TLDR
It is demonstrated that the activity of a single auditory neuron provides sufficient information for the toxic dogbane tiger moth, Cycnia tenera, to decide when to initiate defensive sound production in the face of bats. Expand
Nocturnal activity positively correlated with auditory sensitivity in noctuoid moths
TLDR
It is suggested that species-specific differences in the detection of predator cues are important but often overlooked factors in the evolution and maintenance of antipredator behaviour. Expand
Release from bats: genetic distance and sensoribehavioural regression in the Pacific field cricket, Teleogryllus oceanicus
TLDR
It is concluded that the absence of bats has caused partial regression in the nervous control of a defensive behaviour in this insect. Expand
The adaptive function of tiger moth clicks against echolocating bats: an experimental and synthetic approach
TLDR
These findings support the hypotheses that the clicks of arctiid moths are both an active defence (through echolocation disruption) and a reliable indicator of chemical defence against aerial-hawking bats. Expand
The simple ears of noctuoid moths are tuned to the calls of their sympatric bat community
TLDR
It is demonstrated that the relationships between threshold and size in moths were only significant at some frequencies, and these frequencies differed between three locations, and that the best threshold and best frequency of the less sensitive A2 receptor are also related to size. Expand
Behavioral Flexibility Positively Correlated with Relative Brain Volume in Predatory Bats
TLDR
In analyses using both species level data and phylogenetically independent contrasts, relative brain size was larger in behaviorally flexible species and relative neocortex volume was significantly reduced in bats that aerially hawk prey primarily in open spaces. Expand
Extinction of the acoustic startle response in moths endemic to a bat‐free habitat
TLDR
It is concluded that the absence of bats in this habitat has caused the neural circuitry that normally controls the ASR behaviour in bat‐exposed moths to become decoupled from the functionally vestigial ears of endemic Tahitian moths. Expand
Why Do Diurnal Moths Have Ears?
TLDR
It is determined that all of the day-flying moths spend 44–73% of their 24-hour cycles active at night when bats hunt, and that in their absence these sensory structures degenerate. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...