Evolutionary Psychology Versus Fodor: Arguments For and Against the Massive Modularity Hypothesis

@article{Frankenhuis2007EvolutionaryPV,
  title={Evolutionary Psychology Versus Fodor: Arguments For and Against the Massive Modularity Hypothesis},
  author={Willem E. Frankenhuis and Annemie Ploeger},
  journal={Philosophical Psychology},
  year={2007},
  volume={20},
  pages={687 - 710}
}
Evolutionary psychologists tend to view the mind as a large collection of evolved, functionally specialized mechanisms, or modules. Cosmides and Tooby (1994) have presented four arguments in favor of this model of the mind: the engineering argument, the error argument, the poverty of the stimulus argument, and combinatorial explosion. Fodor (2000) has discussed each of these four arguments and rejected them all. In the present paper, we present and discuss the arguments for and against the… 

Why Evolutionary Psychology Should Abandon Modularity

TLDR
This work provides a framework for clarifying at what level of analysis one is approaching the mind, and explains how a systemic failure to distinguish between different levels of analysis has led to profound misunderstandings of not only evolutionary psychology, but also of the entire cognitivist enterprise of approach the mind at the level of mechanism.

Evolutionary psychology. Controversies, questions, prospects, and limitations.

TLDR
This article identifies some of the most common concerns of evolutionary psychology and attempts to elucidate evolutionary psychology's stance pertaining to them, and concludes with a discussion of the limitations of current evolutionary psychology.

Why the (gene) counting argument fails in the massive modularity debate: The need for understanding gene concepts and genotype-phenotype relationships

TLDR
The counting argument as it is used in discussions of the alleged massive modularity of the brain is assessed, and it is concluded that this argument cannot be upheld in light of recent philosophical work on gene concepts and empirical work on genome complexity.

From computers to cultivation: reconceptualizing evolutionary psychology

TLDR
It is argued that evolutionary psychology is a mainstream computational theory, and that its arguments for domain-specificity often rest on shaky premises, and it is suggested that the various forms of e-cognition represent a true alternative to standard computational approaches.

Modularity of Mind and Second Language Acquisition

TLDR
The concept of modularity has become significant in philosophy and psychology since the early 1980s, following the publication of Fodor's ground-breaking book The Modularity of Mind (1983), and has played a role in recent debates in epistemology, philosophy of language, and other core areas of philosophy.

Evolutionary Systems Theory: A Unifying Meta-Theory of Psychological Science

TLDR
A hierarchical metatheory of psychological science is proposed that synthesizes neo-Darwinian selectionist thinking and dynamic systems theory by organizing evolutionary psychology, evolutionary developmental biology, developmental psychobiology, and the subdisciplines of psychology around four specific, interrelated levels of analysis.

How Intractability Spans the Cognitive and Evolutionary Levels of Explanation

TLDR
It is explained how non‐classical accounts do not currently have the upper hand on the new playing field, and three proposals that seek to ensure the tractability of cognition by shifting part of the explanation from the cognitive to the evolutionary level are considered.

Sense or non-sense? a critical discussion of a recent evolutionary–cognitive approach to “folk-economic beliefs”

Laypeople hold beliefs about economics and policy issues—so-calledfolk-economic beliefs(FEBs)—that are often wrong or misleading according to professional economists. Here, I critically discuss a

The evolution of general intelligence

TLDR
The implications of general intelligence in nonhuman animals for current theories about its evolution are evaluated and support is found for the cultural intelligence approach, which stresses the critical importance of social inputs during the ontogenetic construction of survival-relevant skills.

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 123 REFERENCES

Evolutionary Psychology and the Massive Modularity Hypothesis

  • R. Samuels
  • Psychology
    The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
  • 1998
In recent years evolutionary psychologists have developed and defended the Massive Modularity Hypothesis, which maintains that our cognitive architecture—including the part that subserves ‘central

Evolutionizing the Cognitive Sciences: A Reply to Shapiro and Epstein

TLDR
It is argued that the social sciences will be revolutionized when their practitioners realize that theories about the evolved architecture of the human mind play a necessary and central role in any causal account of human affairs.

Evolutionary theory meets cognitive psychology: A more selective perspective

TLDR
It is argued that the real value of evolutionary theory for psychology lies in the heuristic role it plays in determining the function of psychological mechanisms and in the depth it contributes to explanations of why psychological processes have the proper- ties they do.

Resolving the debate on innate ideas: Learnability constraints and the evolved interpenetration of motivational and conceptual functions

TLDR
Studying psychology and neuroscience without the analytical tools offered by evolutionary theory is like attempting to do physics without using mathematics: it may be possible, but the rationale for inflicting needless damage on the authors' ability to understand the world is obscure.

Fodor on Cognition, Modularity, and Adaptationism

  • S. Okasha
  • Psychology, Biology
    Philosophy of Science
  • 2003
TLDR
This paper critically examines Jerry Fodor’s latest attacks on evolutionary psychology and concludes that his critique fails to show that adopting a broadly Darwinian approach to cognition is intellectually indefensible.

Modularity in cognition: framing the debate.

TLDR
It is proposed that modularity, cleanly defined, provides a useful framework for directing research and resolving debates about individual cognitive systems and the nature of human evolved cognition.

Biological thinking in evolutionary psychology: Rockbottom or quicksand?

TLDR
It is argued that functional thinking is an indispensable tool for psychology, but it gains little from association with evolutionary notions of selection, and the cherished integrative causal model evaporates, and evolutionary phraseology serves no more than rhetorical purposes.

Are Evolutionary Explanations Unfalsifiable? Evolutionary Psychology and the Lakatosian Philosophy of Science

Are the methods and strategies that evolutionary psychologists use to generate and test hypotheses scientifically defensible? This target article addresses this question by reviewing principles of

Modules, Brain Parts, and Evolutionary Psychology

TLDR
Narrow evolutionary psychology further closely couples the claim that mental abilities are adaptive to a commitment to modularity of mental functions to a link between modularity and narrow evolutionary psychology.

How to pursue the adaptationist program in psychology

TLDR
It is argued that by employing a wide range of methods for inferring adaptation and adopting an inference to the best explanation strategy for evaluating adaptation explanations, doubts over both the methodology and the possibility of ever developing acceptably rigorous evolutionary explanations of human psychological phenomena can be adequately addressed.
...