Corpus ID: 30642286

Evolution of the Duty of Care: Some Thoughts

@article{Murphy2015EvolutionOT,
  title={Evolution of the Duty of Care: Some Thoughts},
  author={J. P. Murphy},
  journal={Depaul Law Review},
  year={2015},
  volume={30},
  pages={147}
}
  • J. P. Murphy
  • Published 2015
  • Psychology
  • Depaul Law Review
  • References

    Publications referenced by this paper.
    SHOWING 1-7 OF 7 REFERENCES
    435-42, 551 P.2d at 343-47, 131 Cal. Rptr. at 23-27. 158. Id. 159. Id. 160. Also of interest in this regard is the recent decision in Lipari v
      A+A+A+C
      • 543
      Bartell v. Palos Verdes Peninsula School Dist
        Justice Musmanno's characterization of the "crushing burden" school of jurisprudence. See note 46 supra. 176. See note 103 and accompanying text supra
          Tarasoff special relationship analysis applied; no duty on psychiatrist to take measures to prevent, warn or inform deceased's parents of danger of suicide), modified 81 Cal
          • 1977
          This duty requires that the therapist initiate whatever precautions are reasonably necessary to protect the potential victims of his patient. Id. at 193 (emphasis added). 161
            depositor-creditor relation does not give rise to special relationship between bank and beneficiaries of depositors), rev'd sub non. Bullis v. Security Pac. Nat'l Bank, 21 Cal
            • 1976