Evidence that the root of the tree of life is not within the Archaea.

@article{Skophammer2006EvidenceTT,
  title={Evidence that the root of the tree of life is not within the Archaea.},
  author={Ryan Skophammer and C. Herbold and M. Rivera and Jacqueline A. Servin and J. Lake},
  journal={Molecular biology and evolution},
  year={2006},
  volume={23 9},
  pages={
          1648-51
        }
}
The Archaea occupy uncommon and extreme habitats around the world. They manufacture unusual compounds, utilize novel metabolic pathways, and contain many unique genes. Many suspect, due to their novel properties, that the root of the tree of life may be within the Archaea, although there is little direct evidence for this root. Here, using gene insertions and deletions found within protein synthesis factors present in all prokaryotes and eukaryotes, we present statistically significant evidence… Expand

Figures and Tables from this paper

Evidence excluding the root of the tree of life from the actinobacteria.
TLDR
Evidence that the root of life is outside the Actinobacteria is presented, using gene insertions and deletions found in the DNA gyrase, GyrA, and in the paralogous DNA topoisomerase, ParC. Expand
Polyphasic evidence delineating the root of life and roots of biological domains.
Twenty different lines of polyphasic evidence obtained from tRNA and protein sequences, anticodon usages, gene contents, metabolism and geochemistry have made possible the identification of a LastExpand
Integrative modeling of gene and genome evolution roots the archaeal tree of life
TLDR
A consensus unrooted archaeal topology is constructed using protein concatenation and a multigene supertree method based on 3,242 single gene trees, and a recently developed model of genome evolution is developed to identify the most likely root for the tree. Expand
The evidence that the tree life is not rooted within the Archaea is unreliable: A reply to Skophammer et al.
TLDR
Evidence suggesting that the tree of life cannot be rooted within the Archaea domain is reported, with evidence that an alignment used in their analysis is not reliable and that, therefore, their conclusions are unjustified. Expand
Genome beginnings: rooting the tree of life
TLDR
A new root of life obtained through the analysis of indels, insertions and deletions, found within paralogous gene sets is introduced, implying that the last common ancestor was not hyperthermophilic, although moderate thermophily cannot be excluded. Expand
Evidence for a gram-positive, eubacterial root of the tree of life.
TLDR
A newly developed rooting algorithm, top-down rooting, is applied to indels found in informational and operational gene sets, new computational tools for indel analyses are introduced, and evidence that the root of the tree of life is not present in its traditional location, between the Eubacteria and the Archaebacteria is presented. Expand
The origin of a derived superkingdom: how a gram-positive bacterium crossed the desert to become an archaeon
TLDR
A synthesis of the hypotheses of Lake, Gupta, and Cavalier-Smith is possible where a combination of antibiotic warfare and viral endosymbiosis in the bacilli led to dramatic changes in a bacterium that resulted in the birth of archaea and eukaryotes. Expand
Evidence for a new root of the tree of life.
TLDR
Mapping the phylogenetic distributions of genes involved in peptidoglycan and lipid synthesis onto this rooted tree parsimoniously implies that the cenancestral prokaryotic population consisted of organisms enclosed by a single, ester-linked lipid membrane, covered by a peptidglycan layer. Expand
Phylogenomic analysis of proteins that are distinctive of Archaea and its main subgroups and the origin of methanogenesis
TLDR
All methanogenic archaea form a monophyletic group exclusive of other archaea and that this lineage likely evolved from Archaeoglobus, particularly regarding the origin of methanogenesis. Expand
Rooting the ribosomal tree of life.
TLDR
Using a phylogenetic tree of concatenated ribosomal proteins, the analysis of amino acid compositional bias detects a strong and unique signal associated with the early expansion of the genetic code, placing the root of the translation machinery along the bacterial branch. Expand
...
1
2
3
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 25 REFERENCES
Archaea and the prokaryote-to-eukaryote transition.
TLDR
This review considers the cumulative knowledge about the Archaea in relationship to the Bacteria and Eucarya and the recent use of molecular phylogenetic approaches to reconstructing the tree of life. Expand
Evidence that eukaryotes and eocyte prokaryotes are immediate relatives.
TLDR
The eocytes are the closest surviving relatives (sister taxon) of the eukaryotes, and the related (paralogous) genes encoding elongation factor EF-2 and initiation factor IF-2 also lacked the 11-amino acid insert. Expand
Time for a change
TLDR
Comparisons of RNA and DNA sequences now render this model of life's origins obsolete, even misleading, and it is time to drop the term prokaryote, says Norman Pace. Expand
Protein Phylogenies and Signature Sequences: A Reappraisal of Evolutionary Relationships among Archaebacteria, Eubacteria, and Eukaryotes
  • Radhey S. Gupta
  • Biology, Medicine
  • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
  • 1998
TLDR
Evidence from indels supports the view that the archaebacteria probably evolved from gram-positive bacteria and suggests that this evolution occurred in response to antibiotic selection pressures, and an alternative model of microbial evolution based on the use of indels of conserved proteins and the morphological features of prokaryotic organisms is proposed. Expand
The root of the universal tree and the origin of eukaryotes based on elongation factor phylogeny.
TLDR
It is found that a combined data set of EF-Tu and EF-G sequences favors placement of the eukaryotes within the Archaea, as the sister group to the Crenarchaeota. Expand
Animals and fungi are each other's closest relatives: congruent evidence from multiple proteins.
  • S. Baldauf, J. Palmer
  • Biology, Medicine
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
  • 1993
TLDR
Congruence among multiple lines of evidence strongly suggests, in contrast to traditional and current classification, that animals and fungi are sister groups while plants constitute an independent evolutionary lineage. Expand
The Rooting of the Universal Tree of Life Is Not Reliable
TLDR
All composite protein trees used to root the universal tree of life with updated data sets are revisited and it is suggested that an eukaryotic rooting could be a more fruitful working hypothesis, as it provides a simple explanation to the high genetic similarity of Archaebacteria and Eubacteria inferred from complete genome analysis. Expand
Genomics and the Irreducible Nature of Eukaryote Cells
TLDR
Large-scale comparative genomics in harness with proteomics has substantiated fundamental features of eukaryote cellular evolution and shows that sequence loss and cellular simplification are common modes of evolution. Expand
Origin and early evolution of eukaryotes inferred from the amino acid sequences of translation elongation factors 1alpha/Tu and 2/G.
TLDR
The phylogenetic relationship among eukaryotes, archaebacteria, and eubacteria is analyzed by the ML method of protein phylogeny using amino acid sequence data of EF-1α/Tu and 2/G to support the hypothesis that eukaries have evolved from the eocyte-like organism. Expand
Evolutionary relationship of archaebacteria, eubacteria, and eukaryotes inferred from phylogenetic trees of duplicated genes.
TLDR
A composite phylogenetic tree with two clusters corresponding to different proteins, from which the evolutionary relationship of the primary kingdoms is determined uniquely is proposed, revealing that archaebacteria are more closely related to eukaryotes than to eubacteria for all the cases. Expand
...
1
2
3
...