Evidence on “What Works”: An Argument for Extended-Term Mixed-Method (ETMM) Evaluation Designs

@article{Chatterji2004EvidenceO,
  title={Evidence on “What Works”: An Argument for Extended-Term Mixed-Method (ETMM) Evaluation Designs},
  author={Madhabi Chatterji},
  journal={Educational Researcher},
  year={2004},
  volume={33},
  pages={13 - 3}
}
Federal policy tools for gathering evidence on “What Works” in education, such as the What Works Clearinghouse’s (WWC) standards, emphasize randomized field trials as the preferred method for generating scientific evidence on the effectiveness of educational programs. This article argues instead for extended-term mixed-method (ETMM) designs. Emphasizing the need to consider temporal factors in gaining thorough understandings of programs as they take hold in organizational or community settings… Expand
211 Citations
Grades of Evidence
  • 34
  • PDF
An Analysis of the Fidelity Implementation Policies of the What Works Clearinghouse
  • 23
  • PDF
Causal inferences on the effectiveness of complex social programs: Navigating assumptions, sources of complexity and evaluation design challenges.
  • 11
Conclusion: Agency in the face of complexity and the future of assumption-aware evaluation practice.
  • 3
  • PDF
The development of the concept of “evidence” in the U.S. educational policies
Building Confidence in Qualitative Research
  • 45
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 58 REFERENCES
Contestation and Change in National Policy on “Scientifically Based” Education Research
  • 240
  • PDF
Beyond Use: Understanding Evaluation’s Influence on Attitudes and Actions
  • 288
  • PDF
Comment: “Science” Rejects Postmodernism
  • 101
...
1
2
3
4
5
...