Evidence of effectiveness in the Cohesive Strategy: measuring and improving wildfire response

  title={Evidence of effectiveness in the Cohesive Strategy: measuring and improving wildfire response},
  author={Toddi A. Steelman and Branda Nowell},
  journal={International Journal of Wildland Fire},
The United States’ National Cohesive Wildfire Management Strategy aims to achieve greater social and ecological resilience to wildfire. It also raises the question: cohesive for whom and for what purpose? In this article, we address the wildfire response goal and what a cohesive response means. Namely, we define a cohesive response as the ability to co-manage across scales for a more effective wildfire response. Our approach is grounded in the reality of the growing complexity of wildfire… 

Figures from this paper

Wildfire risk science facilitates adaptation of fire-prone social-ecological systems to the new fire reality

Large and severe wildfires are an observable consequence of an increasingly arid American West. There is increasing consensus that human communities, land managers, and fire managers need to adapt

From Checkers to Chess: Using Social Science Lessons to Advance Wildfire Adaptation Processes

This synthesis uses an overarching analogy to outline key wildfire social science lessons and present human adaptation to wildfire as an ongoing process of negotiated trade-offs dictated by the

Toward a Holistic Approach: Considerations for Improved Collaboration in Wildfire Management

State and Federal agencies in the United States manage wildland fires to minimize forest loss and reduce fire impacts on communities living near forests. Despite changes to policy that emphasize the

Transcending Parallel Play: Boundary Spanning for Collective Action in Wildfire Management

A key challenge in the United States is how to manage wildfire risk across boundaries and scales, as roles, responsibilities, and ability to act are distributed among actors in ways that do not

Collaborations and capacities to transform fire management

Promising developments in U.S. federal fire management that rely on collaborative governance are discussed, essential for grappling with complex environmental management challenges to leverage diverse capacities, work across jurisdictions, and support collective action to plan for the long term in the face of pressures to focus on short-term risks and objectives.

Adaptive Governance in Fire-Prone Landscapes

Abstract Wildfire is an influential driver of social and ecological change that calls for adaptive governance on federal lands. We identify supporting and limiting elements of adaptive governance in

A System Dynamics Model Examining Alternative Wildfire Response Policies

A systems dynamics model of a coupled human and natural fire-prone system is developed to evaluate changes in wildfire response policy and suggests that it may be possible to expand the application of wildfires as a restoration tool.

Supporting Wildfire Response During a Pandemic in the United States: the COVID-19 Incident Risk Assessment Tool

An online dashboard that was used operationally throughout the 2020 fire season and was intended to support risk-informed decision-making regarding incident logistics, operations, and COVID-19 mitigations helped to fill a critical information gap.

A Qualitative Study on the US Forest Service’s Risk Management Assistance Efforts to Improve Wildfire Decision-Making

To support improved wildfire incident decision-making, in 2017 the US Forest Service (Forest Service) implemented risk-informed tools and processes, together known as Risk Management Assistance

Forest Roads and Operational Wildfire Response Planning

Supporting wildfire management activities is frequently identified as a benefit of forest roads. As such, there is a growing body of research into forest road planning, construction, and maintenance



Re-Envisioning Community-Wildfire Relations in the U.S. West as Adaptive Governance

Prompted by a series of increasingly destructive, expensive, and highly visible wildfire crises in human communities across the globe, a robust body of scholarship has emerged to theorize,

U.S. wildfire governance as social-ecological problem

There are fundamental spatial and temporal disconnects between the specific policies that have been crafted to address our wildfire challenges. The biophysical changes in fuels, wildfire behavior,

Getting Ahead of the Wildfire Problem: Quantifying and Mapping Management Challenges and Opportunities

Wildfire is a global phenomenon that plays a vital role in regulating and maintaining many natural and human-influenced ecosystems but that also poses considerable risks to human populations and

Towards enhanced risk management: Planning, decision making and monitoring of US wildfire response

Wildfire’s economic, ecological and social impacts are on the rise, fostering the realisation that business-as-usual fire management in the United States is not sustainable. Current response

Wildfire Response Performance Measurement: Current and Future Directions

This paper reviews tangible research products that could be operationalized as KPIs in the near future, and illustrates their calculation and interpretation for a set of large fires that occurred in the U.S. in 2017.

Is Wildfire Policy in the United States Sustainable?

Beginning in 2000, wildfire policy in the United States shifted from focusing almost exclusively on suppression to embracing multiple goals, including hazardous fuels reduction, ecosystem restoration

Application of Wildfire Risk Assessment Results to Wildfire Response Planning in the Southern Sierra Nevada, California, USA

Using results from a recent risk assessment performed on several National Forests in the Southern Sierra Nevada area of California, USA, it is illustrated how POD-level summaries of risk metrics can reduce uncertainty surrounding potential losses and benefits given large fire occurrence, and lend themselves naturally to design of fire and fuel management strategies.

Whither the paradigm shift? Large wildland fires and the wildfire paradox offer opportunities for a new paradigm of ecological fire management

The growing frequency of large wildland fires has raised awareness of the ‘wildfire paradox’ and the ‘firefighting trap’ that are both rooted in the fire exclusion paradigm. However, a paradigm shift

The Structure of Effective Governance of Disaster Response Networks: Insights From the Field

There is significant debate about the appropriate governance structure in a disaster response. Complex disasters exhibit both networked and hierarchical characteristics. One challenge in the field of

Negative consequences of positive feedbacks in US wildfire management

Over the last two decades wildfire activity, damage, and management cost within the US have increased substantially. These increases have been associated with a number of factors including climate