Evidence for Absolute Moral Opposition to Genetically Modified Food in the United States

@article{Scott2016EvidenceFA,
  title={Evidence for Absolute Moral Opposition to Genetically Modified Food in the United States},
  author={Sydney E. Scott and Yoel Inbar and Paul Rozin},
  journal={Perspectives on Psychological Science},
  year={2016},
  volume={11},
  pages={315 - 324}
}
Public opposition to genetic modification (GM) technology in the food domain is widespread (Frewer et al., 2013). In a survey of U.S. residents representative of the population on gender, age, and income, 64% opposed GM, and 71% of GM opponents (45% of the entire sample) were “absolutely” opposed—that is, they agreed that GM should be prohibited no matter the risks and benefits. “Absolutist” opponents were more disgust sensitive in general and more disgusted by the consumption of genetically… 

Figures and Tables from this paper

Is Opposition to Genetically Modified Food “Morally Absolutist”? A Consequence-Based Perspective
TLDR
It is demonstrated that helping GMFs’ opponents imagine a world wherein GMFs are safe and constructive makes the majority willing to welcome GMFs in this context.
Why rational argument fails the genetic modification (GM) debate
Genetic modification (GM) of crops provides a methodology for the agricultural improvements needed to deliver global food security. However, public opposition to GM-food is great. The debate has
Extreme opponents of genetically modified foods know the least but think they know the most
TLDR
In the United States, France and Germany, as peoples’ opposition to genetically modified (GM) foods becomes more extreme, their self-rated understanding of genetic modification increases, but objectively, their knowledge of the science behind genetic modification tends to be poorer.
An Overview of Attitudes Toward Genetically Engineered Food.
TLDR
It is suggested that for many people these perceptions of naturalness and attitudes toward genetically engineered food follow the sympathetic magical law of contagion, in which even minimal contact between a natural food and an unnatural entity pollutes or contaminates the natural entity and renders it unacceptable or even immoral to consume.
Why Consumers Don't see the Benefits of Genetically Modified Foods, and what Marketers can do about It
Evidence from four studies suggests that the moral opposition toward genetically modified (GM) foods impedes the perception of their benefits, and critically, marketers can circumvent this moral
COVID‐19 Induced Stigma in U.S. Consumers: Evidence and Implications
TLDR
The findings suggest that the early stages of evolving food stigmas that could persist in the future and reshape how U S consumers shop for food and the foods they consume may be observing.
The Impact of Pathogen-Disgust Sensitivity on Vaccine and GM Food Risk Perceptions: Some Evidence for Skepticism
Recently scholars and popular commentators have suggested that disgust plays an important role in generating conflict over the risks of both GM foods and universal-childhood vaccinations. This paper
Of Society, Nature, and Health: How Perceptions of Specific Risks and Benefits of Genetically Engineered Foods Shape Public Rejection
ABSTRACT Recent gene editing technologies advances, such as CRISPR/Cas9, will continue to shape the future of agriculture and genetically engineered crops. Using a representative survey of a North
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 76 REFERENCES
Communicating about the Risks and Benefits of Genetically Modified Foods: The Mediating Role of Trust
TLDR
Information provision had little effect on people's attitudes toward genetically modified foods, and perceptions of information source characteristics contributed very little to attitude change, while the type of information strategy adopted had almost no impact on postexperimental attitudes.
PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS OF GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOODS: A NATIONAL STUDY OF AMERICAN KNOWLEDGE AND OPINION
TLDR
This report presents the results from the second phase of a longitudinal study of Americans' knowledge and feelings about agricultural biotechnology and how those perceptions and attitudes have changed over time and discusses the relationship between opinions of GM food and a variety of factors.
Are perceptions of ‘risks’ and ‘benefits’ of genetically modified food (in)dependent?
Worlds apart? The reception of genetically modified foods in Europe and the U.S.
TLDR
The results of survey research on public perceptions of biotechnology in Europe and the United States during 1996-1997, together with an analysis of press coverage and policy formation from 1984 to 1996, can help to answer this question.
Moralization and Becoming a Vegetarian: The Transformation of Preferences Into Values and the Recruitment of Disgust
We describe a rather common process that we call moralization, in which objects or activities that were previously morally neutral acquire a moral component. Moralization converts preferences into
The Biotechnology Communication Paradox: Experimental Evidence and the Need for a New Strategy
In the past, communication strategies aimed at facilitating consumer acceptance of genetically modified foods have focused on technology-driven, top-down practices. The utility of these practices in
Determinants of Consumer Attitudes and Purchase Intentions With Regard to Genetically Modified Food – Results of a Cross-National Survey
Previous research has shown consumers to be highly sceptical towards genetic modification in food production. So far, however, little research has tried to explain how consumers form attitudes and
Affect, culture, and morality, or is it wrong to eat your dog?
TLDR
For Brazilian and U.S. adults and children of high and low socioeconomic status, moral judgments were better predicted by affective reactions than by appraisals of harmfulness and suggestions are made for building cross-culturally valid models of moral judgment.
...
1
2
3
4
5
...