• DOI:10.1152/JN.2000.84.3.1303
• Corpus ID: 18464665

Evidence against direct connections to PPRF EBNs from SC in the monkey.

@article{Keller2000EvidenceAD,
  title={Evidence against direct connections to PPRF EBNs from SC in the monkey.},
  author={Edward L. Keller and Robert McPeek and Talya Salz},
  journal={Journal of neurophysiology},
  year={2000},
  volume={84 3},
  pages={
          1303-13
        }
}

• E. Keller, R. McPeek, T. Salz
• Published 1 September 2000
• Biology, Psychology
• Journal of neurophysiology

Direct projections from the superior colliculus (SC) to the paramedian pontine reticular formation (PPRF) have been demonstrated anatomically. The PPRF contains cells called excitatory burst neurons (EBNs) that execute the final premotoneuronal processing for saccadic eye movements, as well as other burst cells called long-lead burst neurons (LLBNs). Previous electrophysiological tests in monkey have failed to find evidence for monosynaptic connections from the SC to EBNs, but have shown that direct projections to LLBNs exist. The validity of these results has been questioned because EBNs are known to be inhibited during periods of fixation by cells called omnipause neurons (OPNs). In later experiments in cat, the stimulus in the SC was triggered during saccades (when OPNs are off) and direct connections to EBNs were found. The present experiments were conducted to determine whether direct connections from the SC to EBNs could be demonstrated in monkey. LLBNs located near EBNs were also recorded. Single-pulse stimuli were delivered at sites in the SC at current levels well above those required to evoke saccades with pulse train stimuli. The stimuli were triggered shortly after the onset of ipsilateral or contralateral saccades and also slightly after the end of saccades. A sample of 21 EBNs was recorded and none were activated by postsaccadic stimulation or during contralateral saccades. The high spontaneous discharge rates of EBNs during ipsilateral saccades made activation of these cells more difficult to detect; however, when the results were quantified by peristimulus time histograms aligned on stimulus onset, only 1/21 EBNs showed evidence of activation in the monosynaptic range of latencies (<1.6 ms), 13 EBNs were activated at di- or polysynaptic latencies, and 7 were not activated. In contrast, 15/21 LLBNs were activated with latencies in the monosynaptic range. Further evidence supporting the absence of direct connections to EBNs was obtained by realigning the peristimulus time histograms for a subset of EBNs with similar firing rates on the time of occurrence of the last spike before stimulus onset. A subset of EBNs was also studied during drowsy ipsilaterally directed eye drifts, during which these cells were firing at low spontaneous rates and OPNs were off. No evidence for direct connections to EBNs was found in this behavioral state. The variance in results obtained for cat and monkey may be due to a species difference that reflects the more complex signal processing required in the monkey's saccadic system.