Everett and structure

  title={Everett and structure},
  author={D. Wallace},
  journal={Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics},
  • D. Wallace
  • Published 2001
  • Physics
  • Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics
I address the problem of indefiniteness in quantum mechanics: the problem that the theory, without changes to its formalism, seems to predict that macroscopic quantities have no definite values. The Everett interpretation is often criticised along these lines and I shall argue that much of this criticism rests on a false dichotomy: that the macroworld must either be written directly into the formalism or be regarded as somehow illusory. By means of analogy with other areas of physics, I develop… Expand

Paper Mentions

Blog Post
Multiplicity in Everett's interpretation of quantum mechanics
It is concluded that much remains to be done to clarify and specify Everett's approach to quantum mechanics, as the spectrum of opinions on various ontological questions raised byverett's approach is rather large. Expand
The Everett Interpretation
The Everett interpretation of quantum mechanics - better known as the Many-Worlds Theory - has had a rather uneven reception. Mainstream philosophers have scarcely heard of it, save as scienceExpand
The problem of confirmation in the Everett interpretation
It is shown that in an Everettian context, the experimental evidence that is available could not provide empirical confirmation for quantum mechanics, and moreover that the authors would not even be able to establish reference to the theoretical entities of quantum mechanics. Expand
Decoherence and Ontology, or: How I Learned To Stop Worrying And Love FAPP
I make the case that the Universe according to unitary (no-collapse) quantum theory has a branching structure, and so can literally be regarded as a "many-worlds" theory. These worlds are not part ofExpand
A Prolegomenon to the Ontology of the Everett Interpretation
In this article, I briefly explain the quantum measurement problem and the Everett (Many-Worlds) interpretation, in a way that is faithful to modern physics and yet accessible to readers without anyExpand
Spacetime in Everett's interpretation of quantum mechanics
Everett's interpretation of quantum mechanics was proposed to avoid problems inherent in the prevailing interpretational frame. It assumes that quantum mechanics can be applied to any system and thatExpand
Modal Metaphysics and the Everett Interpretation
Recent work on probability in the Everett interpretation of quantum mechanics yields a decision-theoretic derivation of David Lewis’ Principal Principle, and hence a general metaphysical theory ofExpand
Quantum monism: an assessment
Monism is roughly the view that there is only one fundamental entity. One of the most powerful argument in its favor comes from quantum mechanics. Extant discussions of quantum monism are framedExpand
On the Plurality of Quantum Theories: Quantum theory as a framework, and its implications for the quantum measurement problem
Only the Everett interpretation is currently suited to make sense of quantum physics as the authors find it. Expand
Bohmian trajectories and the ether: Where does the analogy fail?
Abstract Once considered essential to the explanation of electromagnetic phenomena, the ether was eventually discarded after the advent of special relativity. The lack of empirical signature ofExpand


Worlds in the Everett interpretation
This is a discussion of how we can understand the world-view given to us by the Everett interpretation of quantum mechanics, and in particular the role played by the concept of `world'. The viewExpand
"Relative State" Formulation of Quantum Mechanics
The task of quantizing general relativity raises serious questions about the meaning of the present formulation and interpretation of quantum mechanics when applied to so fundamental a structure asExpand
'Many Minds' Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics
Seventy years after the discovery of modern quantum mechanics, there is still no consensus as to how the theory should be understood. The philosophies of Niels Bohr and of the logical positivists,Expand
Identity and Probability in Everett's Multiverse
  • P. Tappenden
  • Sociology
  • The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
  • 2000
There are currently several versions of Everett's relative state interpretation of quantum mechanics, responding to a number of perceived problems for the original proposal. One of those problems isExpand
This is a critical review of the literature on many-worlds interpretations, MWI, with arguments drawn partly from earlier critiques by Bell and Stein. The essential postulates involved in various MWIExpand
In this paper, we shall show how the theory of measurements is to be understood from the point of view of a physical interpretation of the quantum theory in terms of hidden variables developed in aExpand
Discussion: Byrne and Hall on Everett and Chalmers
Byrne and Hall (1999) criticized the argument of Chalmers (1996) in favor of the Everett-style interpretation. They claimed to show “the deep and underappreciated flaw in any Everett-styleExpand
On the Emergence of Time in Quantum Gravity
We discuss from a philosophical perspective the way in which the normal concept of time might be said to `emerge' in a quantum theory of gravity. After an introduction, we briefly discuss the notionExpand
Quantum Mechanics in the Light of Quantum Cosmology
We sketch a quantum mechanical framework for the universe as a whole. Within that framework we propose a program for describing the ultimate origin in quantum cosmology of the quasiclassical domainExpand
Environment-Induced Decoherence and the Transition from Quantum to Classical
We study dynamics of quantum open systems, paying special attention to these aspects of their evolution which are relevant to the transition from quantum to classical. We begin with a discussion ofExpand