• DOI:10.1007/s10337-019-03715-y
• Corpus ID: 132207106

Evaluation of the Presence of 1,3-Dimethylamylamine in Pelargonium Leaves and Essential Oils by Mass Spectrometric and Chromatographic Methods

@article{KerpeldosSantos2019EvaluationOT,
  title={Evaluation of the Presence of 1,3-Dimethylamylamine in Pelargonium Leaves and Essential Oils by Mass Spectrometric and Chromatographic Methods},
  author={Ma{\'i}ra Kerpel dos Santos and Gabriela Blauth Walber and Tain{\'a} Kreutz and Krissie Daian Soares and Let{\'i}cia Jacobi Danielli and Kristiane de C{\'a}ssia Mariotti and Mara Rejane Ritter and Glen P. Jackson and Luis Arroyo and Renata Pereira Limberger},
  journal={Chromatographia},
  year={2019},
  volume={82},
  pages={875-883}
}

• Maíra Kerpel dos Santos, Gabriela Blauth Walber, +7 authors Renata Pereira Limberger
• Published 6 April 2019
• Chemistry
• Chromatographia

Abstract1,3-Dimethylamylamine (DMAA) is known to be added to dietary supplements from synthetic sources and, presumably, from natural geranium oil. However, the natural occurrence of DMAA in geranium oil (Pelargonium graveolens) has been controversial as published studies report contradicting findings. It is unclear if the difference in detection of DMMA in Pelargonium species is a result of the loss during extraction methods, different detection capabilities of analytical methods or if the content of DMAA is dependent of the species and geographical origins. Consequently, the purpose of this study is threefold: (1) to compare the analytical performance of mass spectrometry methods for the detection of DMMA, including GC/MS, DART–MS/MS and LC–MS/MS; (2) to evaluate if DMMA is lost during the extraction of essential oils from Pelargonium leaves of species from Brazil testing headspace extraction, and (3) to evaluate if DMMA is naturally present in a variety of essential oils originating from six countries. This study shows that for detection of more volatile compounds, headspace GC–MS proved to be more favorable than hydrodistilled essential oil analyzed by direct injection in GC–MS. DART–MS/MS showed to be a good alternative for identification of essential oils compounds and DMAA without sample preparation; LC–MS/MS proved to be sensitive for DMMA identification. Nevertheless, even after the analysis using mentioned methods, all essential oils and for the first time, the volatile components extracted from leaves, showed to be absent of DMAA, proving that its presence is not natural in these species.Graphical Abstract