Evaluation of speed, repeatability, and reproducibility of digital radiography with manual versus computer-assisted cephalometric analyses.

@article{Uysal2009EvaluationOS,
  title={Evaluation of speed, repeatability, and reproducibility of digital radiography with manual versus computer-assisted cephalometric analyses.},
  author={Tancan Uysal and Asli Baysal and Ahmet Yagci},
  journal={European journal of orthodontics},
  year={2009},
  volume={31 5},
  pages={523-8}
}
The aims of this study were to evaluate intra-examiner repeatability and inter-examiner reproducibility of landmarks using two cephalometric analysing techniques, manual and computerized, and to compare these for speed. One hundred lateral cephalometric radiographs were randomly selected and 11 angular and six linear parameters were traced and measured by two examiners using the manual method and Dolphin Image Software 9.0 on each radiograph. A Student's t-test for paired and independent… CONTINUE READING

From This Paper

Figures, tables, and topics from this paper.

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 11 extracted citations

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 26 references

A new X-ray technique and its application to orthodontia

  • B HBroadbent
  • Angle Orthodontist
  • 1931
Highly Influential
3 Excerpts

An evaluation of the errors in cephalometric measurements on scanned cephalometric images and conventional tracings

  • T Sekiguchi, S SavaraB
  • European Journal of Orthodontics
  • 2007

A comparison of scanned lateral cephalograms with corresponding original radiographs

  • Q BruntzL, M PalomoJ, S Baden, G HansM
  • American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial…
  • 2006

2004a The effects of differences in landmark identifi

  • H FChang
  • 2004
1 Excerpt

The reproducibility of cephalometric measurements : a comparison of analogue and digital methods

  • A Richardson
  • European Journal of Orthodontics
  • 2002

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…