Evaluation of reliability, validity, and preference for a pediatric pain intensity scale: the Catalan version of the faces pain scale – revised

@article{Mir2004EvaluationOR,
  title={Evaluation of reliability, validity, and preference for a pediatric pain intensity scale: the Catalan version of the faces pain scale – revised},
  author={Jordi Mir{\'o} and Anna Huguet},
  journal={Pain},
  year={2004},
  volume={111},
  pages={59-64}
}
&NA; The main objective of this research was to determine the initial psychometric properties of the Faces Pain Scale – Revised (FPS‐R) as a measure of pain intensity for use with Catalan children and adolescents. Results of the Catalan version of this scale (FPS‐R‐C) are similar to those obtained with the original instrument. In order to assess the validity and reliability of the FPS‐R‐C, two different samples were studied. The first sample contained 124 hospitalized children and adolescents… Expand

Paper Mentions

Observational Clinical Trial
This study evaluates the face validity and cultural acceptability of the Faces Pain Scale - Revised in pediatric patients treated at Mbingo Baptist Hospital, Northwest Province… Expand
ConditionsPain
InterventionOther
Evaluation of reliability, validity, and preference for a pain intensity scale for use with the elderly.
TLDR
The data suggest that, regardless of their age and/or gender, the subjects preferred the FPS-R to the PT, and preliminary evidence of its reliability and convergent and criterion-related validity as well as its strong ordinal properties with a sample of elderly subjects is provided. Expand
Validity and reliability assessment of the Brazilian version of the Faces Pain Scale-Revised
The Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R) is among the most commonly used measures of pain intensity in clinical and research settings. Little evidence exists about the Brazilian version of this scale.Expand
AN APP for the Assessment of Pain Intensity: Validity Properties and Agreement of Pain Reports When Used with Young People.
TLDR
The results demonstrate that pain intensity scores reported with the scales in Painometer are valid, and concordant with their traditional counterparts. Expand
Evidence for the use of a numerical rating scale to assess the intensity of pediatric pain
TLDR
The NRS‐11 showed adequate convergent construct validity when correlated with the Faces Pain Scale – Revised (FPS‐R), and this preference was more marked among girls and younger children. Expand
Is the verbal numerical rating scale a valid tool for assessing pain intensity in children below 8 years of age?
TLDR
It is shown that the vNRS-11 can be used in children as young as 6 years of age, and is also a valid instrument when it is used with Catalan-speaking children between 6 and 8 years old. Expand
Validation of Self-Report Pain Scales in Children
TLDR
The Faces Pain Scale–Revised and CAS overall demonstrate strong psychometric properties in children ages 4 to 17 years, and between subgroups based on age, sex, and ethnicity. Expand
The Utility and Construct Validity of Four Measures of Pain Intensity: Results from a University-Based Study in Spain.
TLDR
The findings suggest that the FPS-R might be the most appropriate pain intensity scale to use when comparisons across populations from different countries is a goal. Expand
Validity and reliability of two pain assessment tools in Brazilian children and adolescents: Validity and reliability of two pain assessment tools
TLDR
Findings support the reliability and the validity of the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability scale and the Revised Faces Pain Scale as a measure of pain in the Brazilian population. Expand
Validity and Reliability of the Verbal Numerical Rating Scale for Children Aged 4 to 17 Years With Acute Pain
TLDR
The findings support the use of the Verbal Numerical Rating Scale for most children aged 6 years and older, but not for those aged 4 and 5 years, and known‐groups validity and responsivity were strong in all years of age. Expand
Validity of four pain intensity rating scales
TLDR
The validity of 4 common pain intensity measures is supported, although the 0–10 Numerical Rating Scale and Visual Analogue Scale evidenced the most responsivity, while the NRS emerged as being both most responsive and able to detect sex differences in pain intensity. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 26 REFERENCES
The Faces Pain Scale – Revised: toward a common metric in pediatric pain measurement
TLDR
The FPS‐R is shown to be appropriate for use in assessment of the intensity of children's acute pain from age 4 or 5 onward, and has the advantage of being suitable for use with the most widely used metric for scoring, and conforms closely to a linear interval scale. Expand
A new analogue scale for assessing children's pain: an initial validation study
TLDR
The CAS has fulfilled the first two criteria for a pain measure (psychophysical properties and discriminant validity), it is ethical to proceed with the formal definitive test for construct validity, in which children from various clinical populations use the CAS scale to assess their own pain. Expand
A comparison of faces scales for the measurement of pediatric pain: children's and parents’ ratings
TLDR
The results of this study indicate that subtle variations in the format of faces scales do influence children's and parents' ratings of pain in clinical settings. Expand
An intrusive impact of anchors in children's faces pain scales
TLDR
It is suggested that children's pain ratings vary depending on the types of faces scale used, and that faces scales with smiling anchors may confound affective states with pain ratings. Expand
Smiling face as anchor for pain intensity scales
TLDR
This study and the study by Carragee et al. (1998) together will inspire to new studies on central sensitization in chronic musculoskeletal pain patients and psychological distressed patients. Expand
Pain sensitivity range: a useful parameter to measure experimentally induced pain?
  • J. Miró, R. Raich
  • Medicine
  • Methods and findings in experimental and clinical pharmacology
  • 1992
TLDR
The authors postulate that PSR might be a good measure in laboratory research to evaluate the effectiveness of analgesic therapies, for its resemblance to the acute pain experience. Expand
Translated versus reconstructed Mc Gill pain questionnaires: A comparative study of two French forms
TLDR
Factor analysis confirm the multidimensional structure with both sensory and affective dimensions in the QA and QDSA, however, the evaluative dimension is more difficult to find. Expand
Pain in Children: Nature, Assessment, and Treatment
In this comprehensive book, Patricia McGrath not only enlightens readers to the complex issues surrounding the assessment and treatment of children's pain, but also provides practical guidelines forExpand
Translation, validation, and adaptation of an instrument to assess the information-seeking style of coping with stress: the Spanish version of the Miller Behavioral Style Scale
Abstract The author presents the translation, validation, and adaptation of the Miller Behavioral Style Scale (MBSS) to be used with Spanish-speaking individuals. Results of the Spanish version ofExpand
International association for the study of pain
TLDR
The VIth World Congress on Pain in Adelaide promises to be the largest world congress on pain so far held and the greatest number of scientific papers ever offered for the an IASP Congress. Expand
...
1
2
3
...