Evaluation of goblet cells in conjunctival impression cytology by multiple-step & two-step staining techniques.

Abstract

Two staining techniques for conjunctival impression cytology (CIC) were evaluated in both eyes of 106 subjects with either early clinical signs of xerophthalmia (17%) or without any obvious ocular disease (83%). One technique consisted of eleven steps of staining while the other of two steps. The slides were evaluated independently in a masked fashion by two readers using three criteria for evaluation of CIC, viz., goblet cells, mucin spots and epithelial cells. By either method, both readers had greatest agreement in evaluation of the goblet cells, the percentage difference being statistically not significant. Errors in interpretation of CIC can be minimized if goblet cells alone are considered as the major criterion of evaluation.

Statistics

05001000201220132014201520162017
Citations per Year

114 Citations

Semantic Scholar estimates that this publication has 114 citations based on the available data.

See our FAQ for additional information.

Cite this paper

@article{Sharma1989EvaluationOG, title={Evaluation of goblet cells in conjunctival impression cytology by multiple-step & two-step staining techniques.}, author={Santvana Sharma and Barbara A. Underwood}, journal={The Indian journal of medical research}, year={1989}, volume={90}, pages={233-6} }