• DOI:10.1002/dta.2539
• Corpus ID: 53241111

Evaluation of endogenous urinary biomarkers for indirect detection of urine adulteration attempts by five different chemical adulterants in mass spectrometry methods.

@article{Steuer2019EvaluationOE,
  title={Evaluation of endogenous urinary biomarkers for indirect detection of urine adulteration attempts by five different chemical adulterants in mass spectrometry methods.},
  author={Andrea Eva Steuer and Dominique Kamber and Thomas Kraemer},
  journal={Drug testing and analysis},
  year={2019},
  volume={11 5},
  pages={
          638-648
        }
}

• A. Steuer, Dominique Kamber, T. Kraemer
• Published 28 November 2018
• Biology
• Drug testing and analysis

Reliable detection of urine adulteration attempts to circumvent positive drug testing represents a critical step for laboratories in abstinence control settings. An ideal workflow for high-throughput testing would involve simultaneous detection of adulteration attempts in the same run with drug detection. Monitoring of degraded or oxidized endogenous urinary compounds as indirect markers has been previously evaluated for that purpose exemplified for the adulterant potassium nitrite (KNO2 ). Fifteen, previously identified endogenous markers should now be evaluated for their general applicability to detect adulteration attempts for the adulterants hypochlorite-based bleach (NaOCl), peroxidase and peroxide (H2 O2 ), pyridinium chlorochromate (PCC), and iodine (I2 ). Initial experiments revealed similar results for the tested adulterants regarding degradation of indolylacryloylglycine (IAG), uric acid (UA), or UA derivatives. 5-Hydroxyisourate (HIU), the oxidation product of UA, was however only formed by KNO2 , PCC, and H2 O2 . Amino acids showed larger adulterant-dependent differences. All reactions were shown to be influenced by the adulterant concentration and the urinary pH with large variances depending on compound and adulterant. Except for HIU/PCC, all markers were stable within +/- 30% variation for all adulterants at -20°C. Receiver operating characteristics indicated best sensitivity and specificity over all adulterants for IAG (specificity 0.9, sensitivity 1.0) and UA (specificity 1.0, sensitivity 0.9). HIU gave best results for KNO2 , PCC, and H2 O2 and N-acetylneuraminic acid for PCC and H2 O2 , respectively. When integrating a limited number of targets into existing screening methods, monitoring of UA, IAG, N-acetylneuraminic acid, and HIU is recommended.