Evaluation of an Argument Visualisation Platform by Experts and Policy Makers

@inproceedings{Tambouris2011EvaluationOA,
  title={Evaluation of an Argument Visualisation Platform by Experts and Policy Makers},
  author={Efthimios Tambouris and Efpraxia Dalakiouridou and Eleni Panopoulou and Konstantinos A. Tarabanis},
  booktitle={ePart},
  year={2011}
}
Argument visualisation (AV) tools enable structured debates around issues, positions and arguments. These tools have the potential to substantially improve transparency e.g. by enabling understanding complex legislation and debating. In this paper we present the results of the evaluation of an AV platform by experts and policy makers. The results suggest the potential of such tools is large particularly for understanding complex legislation and debates. The results indicate an AV tool can be… 

Extending Argument Maps to Provide Decision Support for Rulemaking

  • K. WalkerD. Oard
  • Sociology
    2013 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences
  • 2013
TLDR
A variant of Franklin's method was selected and combined with the argument map to produce an integrated decision support design that represents weights both numerically and visually, allowing the user to dynamically adjust weights relative to those of other arguments.

A Comparative Analysis of Tools and Technologies for Policy Making

TLDR
This chapter aims to present, analyse, and discuss emerging information and communication technologies (ICT) tools and technologies presenting the potential to enhance policy making.

OF ONLINE ARGUMENT REPRESENTATION PLATFORMS A working paper for the Schoilo project

TLDR
This work examines how the limitations of the open internet and lightly structured forums in supporting online deliberation have revealed the challenges including noise, information overload, negative behaviour and polarisation.

Como avaliar a deliberação online?: um mapeamento de critérios relevantes

This paper explores the main criteria used in researches in the field of online deliberation. Through an extensive literature review, we selected 59 articles that list indicators to assess

E-Consultations: A Review of Current Practice and a Proposal for Opening Up the Process

TLDR
A deliberative turn, the use of special purpose technologies and the integration of social media discourse into the consultation process as means to further open it up and to strengthen the connection between government and citizens.

Usability Evaluation of Accessible Complex Graphs

TLDR
The findings of how technically-savvy and technically challenged users experience the different modalities, make choices and identify each modality advantages and shortcomings as well as the ability of each user group to optimally exploit modality combination paths are reported.

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 18 REFERENCES

Political Engagement Through Tools for Argumentation

TLDR
The original prototype of a system for e-democracy that is designed to gather public opinions on political issues has been augmented by the addition of well motivated tools to enable it to handle multiple debates and to provide analyses of the opinions submitted.

Cohere: Towards Web 2.0 Argumentation

TLDR
The current state of the art in Web Argumentation is reviewed, key features of the Web 2.0 orientation are described, and some of the tensions that must be negotiated in bringing these worlds together are identified.

AVER: Argument Visualization for Evidential Reasoning

TLDR
AVER provides an interface which supports the construction and visualization of argument graphs and handles more advanced argumentation concepts such as schemes, based on a known argument ontology and has a solid theoretical underpinning in formal theories of argumentation.

Towards an evaluation framework for eParticipation

Purpose – The paper seeks to demonstrate the use of a range of perspectives and methods to evaluate eParticipation initiatives. It aims to argue that there is a need for coherent evaluation

A General Inductive Approach for Analyzing Qualitative Evaluation Data

TLDR
Although the general inductive approach is not as strong as some other analytic strategies for theory or model development, it does provide a simple, straightforward approach for deriving findings in the context of focused evaluation questions.

Evaluating eParticipation Projects : Practical Examples and Outline of an Evaluation Framework

  • Business
  • 2009
As regards the need for sound evaluation, research on eParticipation has not kept pace with advances in eParticipation practice. This article acknowledges the importance of systematic analyses of

Evaluating Environmental Public Participation: Methodological Questions

Increasingly, environmental agencies are engaged in public participation activities. Unfortunately, the limited evaluation of public participation programmes also makes improvement of such programmes

eParticipation initiatives: How is Europe progressing?

This paper aims to determine the progress and current trends of eParticipation activities across Europe. For this purpose, a European survey took place aiming to identify, record and analyse fully

Dilemmas in a general theory of planning

The search for scientific bases for confronting problems of social policy is bound to fail, becuase of the nature of these problems. They are “wicked” problems, whereas science has developed to deal