Evaluating the Impacts of “New” Performance Funding in Higher Education

  title={Evaluating the Impacts of “New” Performance Funding in Higher Education},
  author={Nicholas W. Hillman and David A. Tandberg and Alisa Hicklin Fryar},
  journal={Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis},
  pages={501 - 519}
In 2007, Washington adopted the Student Achievement Initiative, a statewide performance accountability system designed to improve retention rates and degree productivity among community colleges. Using difference-in-differences analysis, we found that the policy change has had little immediate effect on retention rates or associate’s degree productivity. However, community colleges produced more short-term certificates after the policy reform. These results are robust across many alternative… Expand

Figures and Tables from this paper

Evaluating the Impact of Performance Funding in Ohio and Tennessee
Today, 35 states use performance-based funding models tying appropriations directly to educational outcomes. Financial incentives should induce colleges to improve performance, but there are severalExpand
An Examination of the (Un)Intended Consequences of Performance Funding in Higher Education
Previous studies have shown that state performance funding policies do not increase baccalaureate degree production, but higher education scholarship lacks a rigorous, quantitative analysis of theExpand
Shifting from Enrollment- to Performance-Based Funding in Higher Education: What Can We Learn from Washington's Experience?
Performance-based funding (PBF) in higher education has grown in recent years as a means of institutional accountability and incentive for improving student success. Although most states haveExpand
The use of performance-based funding that ties state higher education appropriations to performance metrics has increased dramatically in recent years, but most programs place at stake a smallExpand
Performance Funding and Historically Black Colleges and Universities: An Assessment of Financial Incentives and Baccalaureate Degree Production
Pay-for-performance has become a state finance policy du jour for public postsecondary institutions. A total of 35 states currently distribute varying amounts of appropriations to colleges andExpand
The Impact of Performance-Based Funding on Historically Black Colleges and Universities
  • W. Boland
  • Learning and Performance Assessment
  • 2020
More than half of the states in the U.S. fund public colleges and universities, based in part on those institutions meeting performance metrics. Given increasing political and public interest inExpand
Four Decades of Performance Funding and Counting
  • Amy Y. Li
  • Business
  • Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research
  • 2021
Performance funding policies for higher education tie a portion of state revenue to public colleges according to student outcomes. This chapter is a comprehensive literature review of researchExpand
The Effect of Large-scale Performance-Based Funding in Higher Education
The use of performance-based funding that ties state higher education appropriations to performance metrics has increased dramatically in recent years, but most programs place at stake a smallExpand
Performance Funding Policy Effects on Community College Outcomes: Are Short-Term Certificates on the Rise?
Objective: Performance funding (PF) policies allocate a portion of state funding to colleges based on student outcomes. This study is the first to account for policy type and design differences, andExpand
Does Performance-Based Funding Affect Colleges’ Financial Priorities?
State-level performance-based funding (PBF) policies are an increasingly common way to allocate funds to public colleges and universities. While a growing body of research has examined whether theseExpand


Performance Funding in Higher Education: Do Financial Incentives Impact College Completions?
In 2000, the Pennsylvania State System of Higher Education introduced a performance-based funding model aimed at increasing degree productivity among the state’s public colleges. This study examinesExpand
Performance-Based Funding of Higher Education: A Detailed Look at Best Practices in 6 States.
Today’s fiscal environment has forced states to carefully consider how their limited dollars are spent on higher education. States have commonly allocated funds on the basis of enrollment, a processExpand
The Impacts of State Performance Funding Systems on Higher Education Institutions: Research Literature Review and Policy Recommendations
Over the past three decades policymakers have been seeking new ways to secure improved performance from higher education institutions. One popular approach has been performance funding, whichExpand
Washington State Student Achievement Initiative Policy Study: Final Report.
In 2007, the Washington State Board for Community and Technical Colleges (SBCTC) launched a performance reporting and funding policy called the Student Achievement Initiative (SAI) both to improveExpand
Accountability in Higher Education: Exploring Impacts on State Budgets and Institutional Spending Patterns
Some argue that the public sector should employ greater use of objective, quantitative measures of organizational outcomes so that political leaders and the general public are better able to evaluateExpand
The Effects of Performance Budgeting and Funding Programs on Graduation Rate in Public Four-Year Colleges and Universities.
This study was conducted to determine whether states with performance budgeting and funding (PBF) programs had improved institutional performance of higher education over the five years (1997 throughExpand
State Higher Education Performance Funding for Community Colleges: Diverse Effects and Policy Implications
Background/Context Community colleges are central to the United States’ college completion goals. A popular strategy pushed by a number of influential policy organizations and foundations is a policyExpand
Performance Funding Comes of Age in Tennessee.
The Performance Funding Program is designed to stimulate instructional improvement and student learning as institutions carry out their respective missions. Performance Funding is an incentive forExpand
Impact of Performance Funding on Retention and Graduation Rates
As the architect of the oldest and most stable performance funding program, Tennessee provides a unique opportunity to analyze the impact of changes in performance funding policies on changes inExpand
Performance Incentives and Public College Accountability in the United States: A Quarter Century Policy Audit.
The allocation of funds to public colleges based on performance criteria rather than activity or enrolment criteria is often described as performance funding. In the United States, performanceExpand