Evaluating a learning environment for case-based argumentation skills

  title={Evaluating a learning environment for case-based argumentation skills},
  author={Vincent Aleven and Kevin D. Ashley},
  booktitle={ICAIL '97},
CAT0 is an intelligent learning environment designed to help &@ting law students learn basic skills of making arguments with cases, through practice in theory-testing and argumentation tasks. CAT0 models ways in which experts compare and contrast cases, assess the significance of similarities and differences between cases in light of general domain knowledge, and use the same general knowledge to organize multi-case arguments by issues. CAT0 communicates its model to students by presenting… 

Figures and Tables from this paper

Teaching case-based argumentation through a model and examples
It is a novel result that students can learn basic argumentation skills by studying computer-generated examples, which means that an instructional system does not necessarily need to rely on a very sophisticated understanding of students' arguments, which would be a significant obstacle to developing such systems.
Argumentation Support Tool with Modularization Function and Its Evaluation
A discussion support tool for use on a tablet PC is developed which has a modularization function which divides the complex arguments into modules and integrates semantics of each module.
Opportunities of computer-mediated legal argument in education
Argumentation is a key activity of lawyers. Therefore in law school teaching argumentation is essential. Information technology can provide useful support in argumentation courses. New opportunities
13th BILETA Conference: 'The Changing Jurisdiction'
Argumentation is a key activity of lawyers. Therefore in law school teaching argumentation is essential. Information technology can provide useful support in argumentation courses. New opportunities
Law, Learning, Technology: Reiving Ower the Borders
In computer-based learning, the management of learning on many levels becomes critical to educational success, and the understanding and application of interdisciplinary theory plays an important role in the design and development of materials and in the learning events themselves.
Toward adding knowledge to learning algorithms for indexing legal cases
This paper presents recent progress toward automatically indexing legal opinion texts for a CBR system and illustrates how integrating a legal thesaurus and linguistic information with a machine learning algorithm can help to overcome the difficulties created by legal language.
Cases and Dialectical Arguments - An Approach to Case-Based Reasoning
It is shown how reasoning with cases can be modelled by comparing the corresponding dialectical arguments, and some work on legal ontologies is briefly discussed regarding the role attributed to cases.
Finding factors: learning to classify case opinions under abstract fact categories
The hypothesis is that adding domain specific knowledge to full-text opinion tezts will enhance performance, and that a successful system m-11 facilitate building legal case-based reasoning systems and legal research.
An Adviser Agent for Mediator Training
This paper describes an agent that shows advices for supporting mediator on our online mediation support system. The purpose of the advice is an education of mediator, and the agent presents it


Doing things with factors
It is found that human-guided instruction with CATO was as good as classroom instruction, and answers generated by the CATO program were scored higher than the students’ answers, suggesting that the model can potentially be employed even more effectively to teach students.
How Different Is Different? Arguing About the Significance of Similarities and Differences
The instructional program, CATO, uses a model of case-based legal argument to teach law students basic skills of making arguments with cases in a Factor Hierarchy, in which the ‘factors’ used to represent case facts are linked to higher level concerns and legal issues.
LITES, an intelligent tutoring system for legal problem solving in the domain of Dutch Civil law
  • G. Span
  • Computer Science
    ICAIL '93
  • 1993
Today’s research focuses on the design of intelligent computer assisted learning programs (ICAL), which adapt itself to the students needs and weaknesses.
Towards Automated Training of Legal Problem Solving.
The research being conducted at the Department of Computer Science and Law at the University of Amsterdam focuses on identifying the different functions in legal reasoning tasks in order to develop computational models which realize these functions.
Artificial Intelligence and Tutoring Systems: Computational and Cognitive Approaches to the Communication of Knowledge
Wenger's book serves three purposes: it acts as a reference, it provides a comprehensive introduction to intelligent tutoring systems, and it develops a coherent framework for thinking about issues in any intelligent system that must communicate its knowledge.
Modeling legal argument - reasoning with cases and hypotheticals
This dissertation is about adversarial, case-based reasoning and the HYPO program that performs adversarial reasoning with cases and hypotheticals in the legal domain and addresses issues of central concern to Artificial Intelligence.
Expert systems and ICAI in tax law: killing two birds with one AI stone
The author shows that non-AI approaches are a way to produce packages quickly and efficiently and AI approaches based on PROLOG are harder to develop to a practical level but will be easier to audit and maintain.
Representing teleological structure in case-based legal reasoning: the missing link
A model for representing the teleological components of legal decisions is proposed and a method for utilizing this representation in a HYPO-like framework for case-based legal argument is suggested.