Evaluating Journal Quality: Is the H-Index a Better Measure Than Impact Factors?

@article{Hodge2011EvaluatingJQ,
  title={Evaluating Journal Quality: Is the H-Index a Better Measure Than Impact Factors?},
  author={David R. Hodge and Jeffrey Lacasse},
  journal={Research on Social Work Practice},
  year={2011},
  volume={21},
  pages={222 - 230}
}
Objectives: This study evaluates the utility of a new measure—the h-index—that may provide a more valid approach to evaluating journal quality in the social work profession. Method: H-index values are compared with Thomson ISI 5-year impact factors and expert opinion. Results: As hypothesized, the h-index correlates highly with ISI 5-year impact factors; but exhibits closer agreement with expert opinion, particularly with high familiarity disciplinary journals. Conclusions: This evidence of… 

Tables from this paper

Evaluating the Productivity of Social Work Scholars Using the h-Index

Objectives: This article reports the first estimated h-index values for social work faculty. Methods: Multiple raters blindly assessed two samples of faculty (1) tenure-track faculty at institutions

Experts’ Judgments of Management Journal Quality

Many lists that purport to gauge the quality of journals in management and organization studies (MOS) are based on the judgments of experts in the field. This article develops an identity concerns

A hybrid indicator for journal ranking: An example from the field of Health Care Sciences and Services

The new, comprehensive citation impact analysis of the 85 HCSS journals shows that the SA index can help researchers to evaluate journal rankings with higher accuracy than the h-index.

Assessing quality for qualitative researchers

It was a delight to get the news: Research and Social Work Practice (RSWP) published a study that asked faculty at PhD-granting institutions to rank 64 Social Work journals in the categories of

Comparing reputation vs h-index rankings of doctoral programs

Purpose This study builds on previous investigations on the scholarship of social work faculty using h-index scores. The purpose of this paper is to compare two methods of determining the

Students’ Journal Paper Citing and Choice of Publisher: The Mediating Roles of Impact Factor and H-Index as Bibliometric Measures

The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between journal citation preference (JCP) of scholars and their choice for publisher (CP) for their research papers. The study also

High-Impact Social Work Scholars

Objective: The purpose of this study was to identify and describe the bibliometric contributions of high-impact social work faculty. Methods: Toward this end, we used a sample comprising fellows (N =

Citation Impact Scores of Top African American Scholars in Social Work Schools

U.S. tenure-track positions have steadily declined over the past 30 years and emphasis on research productivity has escalated. To achieve higher research and scholarship goals, the literature

Gender comparisons of social work faculty using H-Index scores

The results of this study are consistent with the argument that women face unique barriers to academic promotion and other forms of academic success in social work, but do not explain any specific barriers that may cause the gender gap.

Research Productivity in Top-Ranked Schools in Psychology and Social Work

Objectives: We sought the answer to one major research question—Does psychology have a more defined culture of research than social work? Methods: Using U.S. News and World Report 2012 and 2013
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 63 REFERENCES

An Assessment of the Predictive Validity of Impact Factor Scores: Implications for Academic Employment Decisions in Social Work

Objective: Bibliometrics is a method of examining scholarly communications. Concerns regarding the use of bibliometrics in general, and the impact factor score (IFS) in particular, have been

The journal impact factor: too much of an impact?

  • T. HaS. TanK. Soo
  • Business, Medicine
    Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore
  • 2006
The journal impact factor, originally designed for purposes other than the individual evaluation of research quality, is a useful tool provided its interpretation is not extrapolated beyond its limits of validity.

Evaluation of Social Work Journal Quality: Citation versus Reputation Approaches

Although journals are the primary vehicle though which social work professionals explore innovative interventions, research strategies, and policy ideas, journal quality has received little attention

The Journal Impact Factor: don't expect its demise any time soon

  • E. Favaloro
  • Education
    Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine
  • 2009
The perceived utility of the IF has grown way beyond that of its original and still popular use as a surrogate marker of publication ‘quality’, so despite the love-hate relationship with the IF, don't expect its demise any time soon.

Exploring the h-index at the author and journal levels using bibliometric data of productive consumer scholars and business-related journals respectively

SummaryUsing both author-level and journal-level data, Hirsch's h-index is shown to possess substantial heuristic value in that it yields accurate results whilst requiring minimal informational

Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research

Alternative methods for evaluating research are being sought, such as citation rates and journal impact factors, which seem to be quantitative and objective indicators directly related to published science.

Senior Faculty Perceptions of Social Work Journals

Abstract Academic journals are the primary means of disseminating new knowledge. A journal's prestige is a key determinant of its contents' visibility, readership, impact on practice, and use and

The citation impact factor in social psychology: A bad statistic that encourages bad science?

The impact factor is widely used to measure journal quality in social psychology even though it actually measures apparent rather than genuine impact. Analyses of citations in two journals show that

Measuring the research contribution of management academics using the Hirsch-index

This paper applies the Hirsch-index (h-index) to three groups of management academics—BAM Fellows, INFORMS Fellows and members of COPIOR—in order to evaluate the extent to which the h-index would serve as a reliable measure of the contribution of researchers in the management field.

Does Social Work Abstracts Work?

Objective: The current study seeks to provide estimates of the adequacy of journal coverage in the Social Work Abstracts (SWA) database. Method: A total of 23 journals listed in the Journal Citation
...