Ethnic Conflict and the Limits of Nonviolent Resistance

@article{Pischedda2020EthnicCA,
  title={Ethnic Conflict and the Limits of Nonviolent Resistance},
  author={Costantino Pischedda},
  journal={Security Studies},
  year={2020},
  volume={29},
  pages={362 - 391}
}
Abstract Recent research shows that campaigns of nonviolent resistance are much more successful in producing radical political change than armed rebellion. I argue that the study of nonviolent resistance has paid insufficient attention to a key condition for success—a shared ethnic identity between challengers and government. When challengers and incumbent belong to different ethnic groups, the prospects of campaign success are drastically curtailed, as this situation of “ethnic conflict… 
Effective for Whom? Ethnic Identity and Nonviolent Resistance
A growing literature finds that nonviolence is more successful than violence in effecting political change. We suggest that a focus on this association is incomplete, because it obscures the crucial
Religious Support for Civil Resistance Movements: When and How Does It Contribute to Regime Change?
There is substantial research on the influence of elite defections on civil resistance campaign outcomes. Yet most studies focus on defections among security forces, political leaders, and economic
Local elites, civil resistance, and the responsiveness of rebel governance in Côte d’Ivoire
Why is rebel governance more responsive in some areas than in others? In recent years, scholars have started to examine the determinants of rebel governance. Less attention has been given to

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 35 REFERENCES
Do contemporaneous armed challenges affect the outcomes of mass nonviolent campaigns
Civil resistance is a powerful strategy for promoting major social and political change, yet no study has systematically evaluated the effects of simultaneous armed resistance on the success rates of
Community and consent
This study explores popular challenges against the state through nonviolent means. Although previous research has started to examine the effect of these ‘unarmed insurrections’, the relationship
Revolution, non-violence, and the Arab Uprisings
This article combines insights from the literature on revolutions with that on non-violent protest in order to assess the causes and outcomes of the Arab Uprisings. The article makes three main
The Political Effectiveness of Non-State Violence: A Two-Level Framework to Transform a Deceptive Debate
The most striking aspect of the current scholarly debate over the political effectiveness of non-state violence is that, upon careful examination, there is not much of a debate to be found. Despite
Geography and the outcomes of civil resistance and civil war
Abstract This paper reports the results of the first cross-national examination of the impact of the geography of nonviolent contention on regime transitions. Nonviolent tactics ‘work’ in part by
The Diffusion of Nonviolent Campaigns
Existing research has uncovered strong geographical clustering in civil war and a variety of diffusion mechanisms through which violence in one country can increase the risk of outbreaks in other
Understanding strategic choice
What determines why some self-determination disputes develop into mass nonviolent campaigns, others turn into civil wars, and still others remain entirely in the realm of conventional politics? A
Not by the Sword Alone: Soft Power, Mass Media, and the Production of State Sovereignty
Abstract Scholars of civil conflict have long recognized the importance of state strength in the suppression of nascent insurgencies. However, previous empirical investigations have generally focused
Why Civil Resistance Works
arly debates about the efacacy of methods of warfare is the assumption that the most effective means of waging political struggle entails violence.1 Among political scientists, the prevailing view is
Building Reputation: Why Governments Fight Some Separatists but Not Others
This article attempts to show that future players and future stakes—two factors generally ignored by political scientists— strongly influence government decisions to cooperate or fight at least
...
...