Ethical choices behind quantifications of fair contributions under the Paris Agreement

@article{Dooley2021EthicalCB,
  title={Ethical choices behind quantifications of fair contributions under the Paris Agreement},
  author={Kate Dooley and Christian Holz and Sivan Kartha and Sonja Klinsky and J. Timmons Roberts and Henry Shue and Harald Winkler and Tom Athanasiou and Simon Caney and Elizabeth A. Cripps and Navroz K. Dubash and Galen Hall and Paul G. Harris and B{\aa}rd Lahn and Darrel Moellendorf and Benito M{\"u}ller and Ambuj D. Sagar and Peter Nicholas Singer},
  journal={Nature Climate Change},
  year={2021},
  volume={11},
  pages={300 - 305}
}
The Parties to the UNFCCC and Paris Agreement agreed to act on the basis of equity to protect the climate system. Equitable effort sharing is an irreducibly normative matter, yet some influential studies have sought to create quantitative indicators of equitable effort that claim to be value-neutral (despite evident biases). Many of these studies fail to clarify the ethical principles underlying their indicators, some mislabel approaches that favour wealthy nations as ‘equity approaches’ and… 
National ‘fair shares’ in reducing greenhouse gas emissions within the principled framework of international environmental law
ABSTRACT This article tests fairness justifications offered in 168 nationally determined contributions (NDCs) to the 2015 Paris Agreement against the touchstone of principles of international
Utilitarian benchmarks for emissions and pledges promote equity, climate and development
Tools are needed to benchmark carbon emissions and pledges against criteria of equity and fairness. However, standard economic approaches, which use a transparent optimization framework, ignore
Sharing the effort of the European Green Deal among countries
In implementing the European Green Deal to align with the Paris Agreement, the EU has raised its climate ambition and in 2022 is negotiating the distribution of increased mitigation effort among
Reply to Comment on ‘Unintentional unfairness when applying new greenhouse gas emissions metrics at country level’
In reaction to a recent study with the title ‘Unintentional unfairness when applying new greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions metrics at country level’, Cain et al submitted a comment to which we here
Reply to Comment on ‘From the Paris Agreement to corporate climate commitments: evaluation of seven methods for setting “science-based” emission targets’
The Science Based Targets initiative has published a Comment to our study (Bjørn et al 2021 Environ. Res. Lett. 16 054019). We see the Comment as an important step towards addressing our study’s call
Equity implications of net zero visions
With national governments almost universally pledging to achieve net zero emissions, a key uncertainty is how net zero policies will affect global equity. It is unclear which policy measures are
Three Decades of Climate Mitigation: Why Haven't We Bent the Global Emissions Curve?
Despite three decades of political efforts and a wealth of research on the causes and catastrophic impacts of climate change, global carbon dioxide emissions have continued to rise and are 60% higher
Undoing Equivalence: Rethinking Carbon Accounting for Just Carbon Removal
Concerns are increasingly raised over the centrality of carbon removal in climate policy, particularly in the guise of “net-zero” targets. Most significantly perhaps, treating emissions and removals
Capacity for climate change needs knowledge and politics with a difference
ABSTRACT Even after years of understanding of and engagement with the climate problem, our efforts to address the issue remain wholly inadequate. This essay discusses how limitations in our
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 78 REFERENCES
The Ethical Challenges in the Context of Climate Loss and Damage
This chapter lays out what we take to be the main types of justice and ethical challenges concerning those adverse effects of climate change leading to climate-related Loss and Damage (L&D). We argue
Human Rights Versus Emissions Rights: Climate Justice and the Equitable Distribution of Ecological Space
  • T. Hayward
  • Political Science
    Ethics & International Affairs
  • 2007
There is agreement internationally that responsibility for reducing emissions should be equitably shared, but debate about the principles for determining equitable shares frequently focuses on the
Climate justice and historical emissions
Climate change can be interpreted as a unique case of historical injustice involving issues of both intergenerational and global justice. We split the issue into two separate questions. First, how
Human Rights vs Emissions Rights: Climate Justice and the Equitable Distribution of Ecological Space
In debates about principles for differentiating responsibilities for reducing carbon emissions, attention is invariably drawn to claims, staked in the language of rights, that limit responsibilities.
Loss and Damage from Climate Change: Concepts, Methods and Policy Options
This chapter lays out what we take to be the main types of justice and ethical challenges concerning those adverse effects of climate change leading to climate-related Loss and Damage (L&D). We
Fairness in Adaptation to Climate Change
As a global society, we need to take action not only to prevent the potentially catastrophic effects of climate change but also to adapt to the unavoidable effects of climate change already imposed
Equity, climate justice and fossil fuel extraction: principles for a managed phase out
ABSTRACT Equity issues have long been debated within international climate politics, focused on fairly distributing reductions in territorial emissions and fossil fuel consumption. There is a growing
...
...