Ethical Reasoning of High School Seniors Exploring Issues of Free Speech

@article{Kohlmeier2014EthicalRO,
  title={Ethical Reasoning of High School Seniors Exploring Issues of Free Speech},
  author={Jada Kohlmeier and John W. Saye},
  journal={Social Studies Research and Practice},
  year={2014}
}
Because ethical decisions about what is fair or just are at the heart of most controversial issues in the public sphere, understanding how high school seniors reason ethically about conflicting democratic values is important. Teachers and teacher educators would be assisted in leading discussions if they know the ethical frameworks most often used by students and how the facilitator might encourage consideration of alternative ethical viewpoints. By creating a professional community of practice… 

Tables from this paper

Ethical Reasoning of U.S. High School Seniors Exploring Just Versus Unjust Laws

Abstract Because a pluralistic democracy is inherently conflictual, public deliberation of issues holds the potential to expand the thinking of participants by revealing new insights, perspectives,

Examining the relationship between teachers’ discussion facilitation and their students’ reasoning

ABSTRACT We conducted a two-year study with four teachers (two mentors and two mentees), one university researcher, and a political science professor focused on improving discussion facilitation.

Developing Discussion Leaders Through Scaffolded Lesson-Study

ABSTRACT In this study we report the findings of a two-year professional development study using scaffolded lesson-study to encourage and support four teachers' desire to use discussion with

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 61 REFERENCES

Justice or Care? Ethical Reasoning of Preservice Social Studies Teachers

Abstract The authors explored the ethical reasoning of 27 preservice teachers in the first course of a 4-course social studies education program. The students discussed 2 historically analogous cases

Caring: A Feminine Approach to Ethics and Moral Education

Ethics has been discussed largely in the language of the father, Nel Noddings believes: in principles and propositions, in terms such as justification, fairness, and equity. The mother's voice has

The moral justification scale: reliability and validity of a new measure of care and justice orientations.

The Moral Justification Scale shows promise as an easily administered, objectively scored measure of Gilligan's constructs of care and justice, and correlated significantly with the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale.

Justice and caring : the search for common ground in education

Part 1 Theory of Justice and Caring: Care, Justice and Equity, Nel Noddings Justice, Caring and Universality - In Defence of Moral Pluralism, Kenneth A. Strike Justice and Caring - Process in College

Pedagogy for Global Perspectives in Education: Studies of Teachers' Thinking and Practice

Abstract As Americans come to understand the effects of globalization, there is increasing concern that schools today are not adequately preparing students for our interdependent world. Although much

Controversy in the Classroom: The Democratic Power of Discussion

Series Editor Introduction, Michael W. Apple Introduction Section One: The Case for Controversial Political Issues 1. Why Democracy Demands Controversy 2. Rationales for Controversial Political

An Ethic of Care: A Valuable Political Tool?

Since Gilligan first interpreted women's moral position as an ethic of care, feminists have wondered what this means for political action. While some view it as a way of introducing forms of

Care and Justice Moral Reasoning: A Multidimensional Scaling Approach

The purpose of this article is to utilize a recently developed multidimensional scaling methodology to explore the underlying structure of moral reasoning responses to 12 moral dilemmas, developed on the basis of Gilligan's theory, and to relate that structure to individual difference characteristics.

Who Cares? The Effect of Gender and Context on the Self and Moral Reasoning1

Theorists suggest that gender differences in moral reasoning are due to differences in the self-concept, with women feeling connected to others and using a care approach, whereas men feel separate

Care reasoning in real‐life moral conflicts

This article examines real‐life moral conflicts from the perspective of the ethic of care. Fifty‐six (Time 1) and 57 (Time 2) real‐life dilemmas provided by students representing different fields of
...