Ethical Issues Concerning Vaccination Requirements

  title={Ethical Issues Concerning Vaccination Requirements},
  author={Alvin Nelson El Amin and Michelle T. Parra and Robert J. Kim-Farley and Jonathan E. Fielding},
  journal={Public Health Reviews},
Vaccinations are one of public health’s greatest achievements. However, an ethical dilemma lies in the balance of personal autonomy and choice versus protection of the entire at risk population. Vaccines have become readily available in most parts of the world, yet debates continue as to the appropriateness of requirements for vaccinations, including legal mandates of vaccinations during public health emergencies and more routinely for school entry. This paper addresses ethical issues… 

Mass Vaccination Programme: Public Health Success and Ethical Issues – Bangladesh Perspective

This review paper aims to elaborate the ethical issues involved in mass vaccination programme and present some additional challenges in the context of a resource-poor settings of public health in Bangladesh.

The Ethics of Parental Refusal to Vaccinate: Costs, Community Safety, and Individual Rights

Ethical issues of community safety and costs of the outbreak, as well as the rights of the child, should be considered in the debate of childhood vaccination.

Current understandings of the impact of mandatory vaccination laws in Europe

Although mandatory vaccination policies might be needed to protect collective health in times of emergency, public health goals of VPD prevention and health promotion should primarily be pursued through health education and population empowerment.

Human Papillomavirus Vaccination: Making Sense of the Public Controversy

A large body of evidence supports the prevailing scientific opinion that human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines are efficacious, safe, and cost-effective. Since first licensure in 2006, however, HPV


  • L. A. Adeleke
  • Medicine, Political Science
    GET Journal of Biosecurity and One Health
  • 2022
The main thrust of this paper is to examine the effect of corona virus vaccination and Covid-19 status certificate on self-determination and human rights in Nigeria and concludes that with deep rooted trust and transparency, suspicion and mistrust will fizzle out and the legal conundrum ease off.

What are parents' perspectives on psychological empowerment in the MMR vaccination decision? A focus group study

Insights are gained from parents residing in a low measles-mumps-rubella uptake area on what constitutes feelings of empowerment in the decision they have to make on their child's MMR vaccination to promote parental perception of making an informed, autonomous decision.

Public Health Law and Institutional Vaccine Skepticism.

The discussions surrounding vaccine hesitancy that dominate public discourse detract from serious debate as to whether amendments to vaccine-related laws can address the limitations of the existing framework governing immunizations.

Editorial: Why a Theme Issue on Public Health Ethics?

The origins of the modern dialogue on public health ethics, which are based on historic religious and humanistic origins and long held medical and public health values, are explored, and both gross violations of human rights in public health experimentation and in genocide of the last century are explored.

Ethical Challenges in School-Based Immunization Programs for Adolescents: A Qualitative Study.

Ethical challenges for the delivery of adolescent immunization in a school-based setting are identified in 3 main areas: informed consent, restrictions on privacy, and harm to students in the form of fear and anxiety.

Integrating ethics in public health education: the process of developing case studies

The study of ethics in public health became a societal imperative following the horrors of pre World War II eugenics, the Holocaust, and the Tuskegee Experiment, which led to international responses.



Ethical issues in immunisation.

A Critique of Criteria for Evaluating Vaccines for Inclusion in Mandatory School Immunization Programs

This work presents a critique to the approach and criteria for evaluating vaccines for inclusion in mandatory school immunization programs that have been adopted by the Washington State Board of Health and concludes that these 9 criteria can help ensure a deliberate and informed approach to important public policy decisions.

Vaccination and the Prevention Problem

  • A. Dawson
  • Medicine, Political Science
  • 2004
Any ethical objections to prophylactic vaccination on the basis of the 'prevention problem' will not be overcome through the substitution of therapeutic vaccines for preventive vaccines; indeed, the ' Preventions problem' fails on its own terms in relation to preventive vaccination programmes.

Public Health Law and Ethics: A Reader

Are public health law and ethics undergoing a renaissance? 1 Whether or not these disciplines are coming out of some legal and ethical Dark Ages may be debated, but those of us who work on such

Parents With Doubts About Vaccines: Which Vaccines and Reasons Why

Encouraging children's health care providers to solicit questions about vaccines, to establish a trusting relationship, and to provide appropriate educational materials to parents is suggested.

Ethical and legal challenges posed by severe acute respiratory syndrome: implications for the control of severe infectious disease threats.

Various methods that countries used in reaction to the SARS outbreak: surveillance and contact tracing, isolation and quarantine, and travel restrictions are examined, through legal and ethical lenses.

Politics, parents, and prophylaxis--mandating HPV vaccination in the United States.

  • R. Charo
  • Political Science
    The New England journal of medicine
  • 2007
Professor Charo discusses the legal, political, ethical, and financial considerations surrounding the mandating of HPV vaccination in the United States.

The moral justification for a compulsory human papillomavirus vaccination program.

  • J. Balog
  • Medicine
    American journal of public health
  • 2009
This proposal raises the issue of whether government should use its police powers to restrict liberty and parental autonomy for the purpose of preventing harm to young people.