Estimating open access mandate effectiveness: The MELIBEA score

@article{VincentLamarre2016EstimatingOA,
  title={Estimating open access mandate effectiveness: The MELIBEA score},
  author={Philippe Vincent-Lamarre and Jade Boivin and Yassine Gargouri and Vincent Larivi{\`e}re and Stevan Harnad},
  journal={Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology},
  year={2016},
  volume={67}
}
MELIBEA is a directory of institutional open‐access policies for research output that uses a composite formula with eight weighted conditions to estimate the “strength” of open access (OA) mandates (registered in ROARMAP). We analyzed total Web of Science‐(WoS)‐indexed publication output in years 2011–2013 for 67 institutions in which OA was mandated to estimate the mandates' effectiveness: How well did the MELIBEA score and its individual conditions predict what percentage of the WoS‐indexed… 
It Takes More Than a Mandate: Factors that Contribute to Increased Rates of Article Deposit to an Institutional Repository
TLDR
Until more federal policies require open access to articles funded by grants, or institutional policies are in place that require article deposit for promotion and tenure, policies will only be as effective as the library mediated processes that are put in place to identify and solicit articles from faculty.
Open Access Mandates and Policies: The Basics
Abstract Universities can afford to subscribe to only a small percentage of available scholarly journals. Consequently, researchers do not have access to all articles in journals pertinent to their
A Very Long Embargo: Journal Choice Reveals Active Non-Compliance with Funder Open Access Policies by Australian and Canadian Neuroscientists
TLDR
It is found that the implementation of Australian and Canadian funder open access policies in 2012/2013 and 2015 did not reduce the number of publications in non-compliant journals, and scientific output in all publication types increased with the greatest growth in immediate open access journals.
Optimizing Open Access Policy
TLDR
This overview of the current status of Open Access to peer-reviewed research describes the steps that need to be taken to achieve universal OA and urges more institutions and funders to adopt effective OA mandates.
Bulgarian authors’ open access awareness and preferences
The purpose of this paper is to describe the findings of a survey of Bulgarian faculty about the extent to which their research is openly available, awareness of the European Union Competitiveness
Open Access: Current Overview and Future Prospects
TLDR
Overall, open access today looks very different from the goals of its proponents in 2002, and this author takes care to look beyond STEM fields to discuss the effect of open access in the social sciences, humanities, and fine arts.
‘Is the library open?’: Correlating unaffiliated access to academic libraries with open access support
TLDR
The results suggest that while institutional mission statements and academic library policies may refer to sharing of knowledge and research and community collaboration, multiple layers of library user categories, levels of privilege and fees charged can inhibit the realisation of these goals.
Otvorenost u znanosti i visokom obrazovanju
TLDR
This chapter brings the review of OA policies on the European Union level as well as on the national and institutional level in Croatia and an overview of the existing information infrastructure for OA in the EU and Croatia.
Are funder Open Access platforms a good idea?
TLDR
Ethical, organizational, and economic strengths and weaknesses of such platforms, as well as usage and uptake to date, are examined to scope the opportunities and threats presented by funder OA platforms in the ongoing transition to OA.
Where are we now? Survey on rates of faculty self-deposit in institutional repositories
INTRODUCTION The literature of institutional repositories generally indicates that faculty do not self-deposit, but there is a gap in the research of reported self-deposit numbers that might indicate
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 64 REFERENCES
Open Access Policy: Numbers, Analysis, Effectiveness
TLDR
The PASTEUR4OA project analyses what makes an Open Access (OA) policy effective and suggests that it would be useful for current and future OA policies to adopt the seven positive conditions so as to accelerate and maximise the growth of OA.
Self-Selected or Mandated, Open Access Increases Citation Impact for Higher Quality Research
TLDR
The OA advantage is greater for the more citable articles, not because of a quality bias from authors self-selecting what to make OA, but because ofA quality advantage, from users self- selecting what to use and cite, freed by OA from the constraints of selective accessibility to subscribers only.
PEER: green open access — insight and evidence
TLDR
The baseline behavioural survey identified an increasing general awareness of open access, but a lower awareness of institutional and subject repositories, and PEER itself has seen low uptake from authors when invited to self‐deposit into the project.
The effect of open access and downloads ('hits') on citation impact: a bibliography of studies
TLDR
This chronological and comprehensive bibliography of reports showing that open access increases impact as measured by the number of citations provides a way of investigating the meaning of that statement, to understand its effect, to recognise the significant factors involved, and identify the causal relationships between the respective factors.
Ten-year Analysis of University of Minho Green OA Self-Archiving Mandate
University of Minho adopted the first university-wide Green Open Access Mandate in Europe in 2004, requiring all research output to be self-archived in the institution's repository. The mandate was
A Review of Open Access Self-Archiving Mandate Policies
TLDR
It is concluded that an open access mandate policy, by itself, will not change existing practices of scholarly self-archiving.
Green and Gold Open Access Percentages and Growth, by Discipline
TLDR
Green OA exceeds Gold OA in proportion and growth rate in all but the biomedical disciplines, probably because it can be provided for all journals articles and does not require paying extra Gold O a publication fees.
Open Access in 2013: Reaching the 50% Milestone
This article reports a 2013 study on the percentage of Open Access (OA) journal articles. Following the 2009 Björk et al. (2010) model, this study generated 2,655 random sample articles published in
Open Access to the Scientific Journal Literature: Situation 2009
TLDR
The results show that OA already has a significant positive impact on the availability of the scientific journal literature and that there are big differences between scientific disciplines in the uptake.
Opening Access by Overcoming Zeno's Paralysis
...
...