Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies.

  title={Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies.},
  author={Donald B. Rubin},
  journal={Journal of Educational Psychology},
  • D. Rubin
  • Published 1 October 1974
  • Psychology
  • Journal of Educational Psychology
A discussion of matching, randomization, random sampling, and other methods of controlling extraneous variation is presented. The objective is to specify the benefits of randomization in estimating causal effects of treatments. The basic conclusion is that randomization should be employed whenever possible but that the use of carefully controlled nonrandomized data to estimate causal effects is a reasonable and necessary procedure in many cases. Recent psychological and educational literature… Expand
The design versus the analysis of observational studies for causal effects: parallels with the design of randomized trials.
  • D. Rubin
  • Psychology, Medicine
  • Statistics in medicine
  • 2007
The theoretical perspective underlying this position will be presented followed by a particular application in the context of the US tobacco litigation that uses propensity score methods to create subgroups of treated units and control units who are at least as similar with respect to their distributions of observed background characteristics as if they had been randomized. Expand
Estimating the causal effect of randomization versus treatment preference in a doubly randomized preference trial.
A small to moderate benefit of preference versus randomization with respect to the mathematics outcome for those who received mathematics training is found. Expand
Estimating causal effects using prior information on nontrial treatments
A method for comparing the effects of receiving trial treatments in an active-controlled clinical trial where some participants received nontrial treatments and others received no treatment at all is proposed and illustrated in the PENTA 5 trial in HIV-infected children. Expand
Disentangling Treatment and Placebo Effects in Randomized Experiments Using Principal Stratification—An Introduction
This proposal uses principal stratification as the key statistical tool and is applied to initial data from an actual experiment to illustrate important ideas. Expand
Average causal effects from nonrandomized studies: a practical guide and simulated example.
In this article, the authors review Rubin's definition of an average causal effect (ACE) as the average difference between potential outcomes under different treatments and review 9 strategies for estimating ACEs on the basis of regression, propensity scores, and doubly robust methods. Expand
For objective causal inference, design trumps analysis
For obtaining causal inferences that are objective, and therefore have the best chance of revealing scientific truths, carefully designed and executed randomized experiments are generally consideredExpand
Causal inference methods for combining randomized trials and observational studies: a review
This paper first discusses identification and estimation methods that improve generalizability of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using the representativeness of observational data, and methods that combining RCTs and observational data to improve the (conditional) average treatment effect estimation. Expand
Estimating the causal effects of treatment
  • G. Dunn
  • Medicine, Psychology
  • Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale
  • 2002
A relatively non-technical review of recent statistical research on the analysis and interpretation of the results of randomised controlled trials in which there are possibly all three types of protocol violation: non-adherence to allocated treatment, contamination and attrition. Expand
Estimating treatment effects in randomized clinical trials in the presence of non-compliance.
The residual of the regression of the actual treatment indicator variable on the randomization arm indicator variable is shown to 'intercept' the effect of such confounders, and inclusion of this residual in a multivariate analysis, in conjunction with the treatment indicator Variable, should thus adjust for confounding. Expand
Causal Inference in Randomized Experiments
The current chapter contains a brief review of the logic of causal inference in a randomized experiment, namely a randomized paired experiment in which subjects are paired before randomization and one subject in each pair is picked at random to receive treatment, the other receiving control. Expand


The University Group Diabetes Program. A further statistical analysis of the mortality findings.
With no evidence of efficacy and a definite possibility of toxicity the investigators concluded that the safety of the patients still receiving tolbutamide therapy required its discontinuance and that the factual basis for this decision needed to be communicated to the biomedical scientific community. Expand
Controlling Bias in Observational Studies: A Review.
Abstract : This paper reviews work on the effectiveness of different methods of matched sampling and statistical adjustment, alone and in combination, in reducing bias due to confounding x-variablesExpand
The University Group Diabetes Program Study pertaining to phenformin.
The University Group Diabetes Program (UGDP) reports in this issue ofThe Journalan eight-year study in which cardiovascular and total mortality in adult-onset diabetics treated with phenformin wereExpand
The Analysis of Variance
Originally published in 1959, this classic volume has had a major impact on generations of statisticians. Newly issued in the Wiley Classics Series, the book examines the basic theory of analysis ofExpand
Design and analysis of industrial experiments
This paper is based on a lecture on the “Design and Analysis of Industrial Experiments” given by Dr O. L. Davies on the 8th of May 1954 and the recent designs developed by Box for the exploration of response surfaces are briefly considered. Expand
Testing Statistical Hypotheses
The General Decision Problem.- The Probability Background.- Uniformly Most Powerful Tests.- Unbiasedness: Theory and First Applications.- Unbiasedness: Applications to Normal Distributions.-Expand
The Design and Analysis of Experiments
Oscar Kempthorne: The Design and Analysis of Experiments. New York: John Wiley and Sons; London: Chapman and Hall, 1952. Pp. xix + 631. 68s.
Statistics: A Scheffe, H. The analysis of variance. New York: 9 io ihe unknown
  • 1959
Experimental designs. (6th ed
  • New York: Wiley,
  • 1957