Establishing clinically significant change: increment of precision and the distinction between individual and group level of analysis.

@article{Hageman1999EstablishingCS,
  title={Establishing clinically significant change: increment of precision and the distinction between individual and group level of analysis.},
  author={W J Hageman and Willem A. Arrindell},
  journal={Behaviour research and therapy},
  year={1999},
  volume={37 12},
  pages={
          1169-93
        }
}
Some essential adaptations to the method for determining clinically significant change originally introduced by Jacobson, Follette and Revenstorf [Jacobson, N. S., Follette, W. C. & Revenstorf, D. (1984a). Psychotherapy outcome research: methods for reporting variability and evaluating clinical significance. Behavior Therapy, 15, 336-352.] are presented. One adaptation deals with the failure in the original method to distinguish between analysis at the individual versus analysis at the group… CONTINUE READING
Highly Cited
This paper has 73 citations. REVIEW CITATIONS
Related Discussions
This paper has been referenced on Twitter 3 times. VIEW TWEETS

From This Paper

Topics from this paper.

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 39 extracted citations

Mind the MIC: large variation among populations and methods.

Journal of clinical epidemiology • 2010
View 10 Excerpts
Method Support
Highly Influenced

Assessing clinical significance: does it matter which method we use?

Journal of consulting and clinical psychology • 2005
View 5 Excerpts
Highly Influenced

73 Citations

05'99'03'08'13'18
Citations per Year
Semantic Scholar estimates that this publication has 73 citations based on the available data.

See our FAQ for additional information.