Essay Review: Debunking Adapting Minds*

  title={Essay Review: Debunking Adapting Minds*},
  author={E. Machery and H. Barrett},
  journal={Philosophy of Science},
  pages={232 - 246}
David Buller’s recent book, Adapting Minds, is a philosophical critique of the field of evolutionary psychology. Buller argues that evolutionary psychology is utterly bankrupt from both a theoretical and an empirical point of view. Although Adapting Minds has been well received in both the academic press and the popular media, we argue that Buller’s critique of evolutionary psychology fails. 
Evolutionary Psychology: Issues, Results, Debates
This chapter, supposed to introduce to the next four chapters devoted to evolutionary psychology, defines and explains the program of “evolutionary psychology” as it has been initiated in the 80s andExpand
On Fodor‐Fixation, Flexibility, and Human Uniqueness: A Reply to Cowie, Machery, and Wilson
Abstract:  This paper argues that two of my critics (Cowie and Wilson) have become fixated on Fodor’s notion of modularity, both to their own detriment and to the detriment of their understanding ofExpand
Looking for middle ground in cultural attraction theory
It is suggested that what the authors diagnose as misunderstandings are instead superficial interpretive errors, resulting from researchers who have attempted to extract generalizable hypotheses from CAT and bring them into contact with the analytical and inferential models of contemporary cultural evolutionary research. Expand
Constructive criticism: An evaluation of Buller and Hardcastle's genetic and neuroscientific arguments against Evolutionary Psychology
David Buller and Valerie Hardcastle have argued that various discoveries about the genetics and nature of brain development show that most “central” psychological mechanisms cannot be adaptationsExpand
Evolutionary Psychology, Adaptation and Design
I argue that Evolutionary Psychologists’ notion of adaptationism is closest to what Peter Godfrey-Smith (2001) calls explanatory adaptationism and as a result, is not a good organizing principle forExpand
Evolutionary psychology and design reincarnation: A reply to Peters
In this riposte it will be argued that the critique by Peters (2013) of the theoretical foundation of evolutionary psychology misses the mark, and, in the process, unfortunately repeats many commonExpand
Branding and liberal autonomy
Are you manipulated by branding campaigns? This book addresses this question by drawing on work in both philosophy and psychology. It does so from the perspective of the liberal state. As such,Expand
Psychology: a Giant with Feet of Clay.
It is suggested that evolutionary psychology must be intended as a pluralistic approach rather than a monolithic one, and that its main strength is its capacity to resolve the nature-nurture dialectics. Expand
Defending Biobehavioral Science
We argue for the superiority of biologically informed models of human behavior and behavioral variation relative to their purely sociocultural/environmental competitors. It will be shown thatExpand
The Broad Foundations of Adaptationist-Computational Evolutionary Psychology
Evolutionary psychology is too rarely characterized in ways that fully identify its fundamental commitments while avoiding the inclusion of inessential claims, inessentially strong emphases, orExpand


The ‘Cinderella effect’ is no fairy tale
In his polemic against ‘evolutionary psychology’, philosopher David Buller [1] tries to discredit not just its practitioners' theories, but their research findings as well, including our discoveryExpand
The evolution of jealousy
Two decades ago, mainstream psychologists explained jealousy as a pathology, social construction, or by-product of capitalist society, manifested identically in men and women [1]. EvolutionaryExpand
The Mating Game Isn't Over: A Reply to Buller's Critique of the Evolutionary Psychology of Mating
Eager undergraduates who are just learning about critical thinking will often raise their hand in class and say something like: " Wait, it can't be true that men prefer young women! The frat guys IExpand
Modularity in cognition: framing the debate.
It is proposed that modularity, cleanly defined, provides a useful framework for directing research and resolving debates about individual cognitive systems and the nature of human evolved cognition. Expand
Discovery and Confirmation in Evolutionary Psychology
The defining insight of evolutionary psychology consists of bringing considerations drawn from evolutionary biology to bear on the study of human psychology. So characterized, evolutionary psychologyExpand
The evolution of prestige: freely conferred deference as a mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission.
  • J. Henrich, F. Gil-White
  • Sociology, Medicine
  • Evolution and human behavior : official journal of the Human Behavior and Evolution Society
  • 2001
It is argued that a wider range of phenomena associated with prestige processes can more plausibly be explained by this simple theory than by others, and its predictions are tested with data from throughout the social sciences. Expand
The modularity of thought and the epidemiology of representations.
Ten years ago, Jerry Fodor published The Modularity of Mind, a book that received much well-deserved attention. His target was the then-dominant view according to which there are no importantExpand
The Cognitive Neurosciences
Ed Michael S Gazzaniga MIT Press, pounds sterling64.95, pp 1447 ISBN 0 262 07157 6 The performance artist Laurie Anderson referred to her father's death as being “like a library burning to theExpand
Fears, phobias, and preparedness: toward an evolved module of fear and fear learning.
The fear module is assumed to mediate an emotional level of fear learning that is relatively independent and dissociable from cognitive learning of stimulus relationships. Expand
Mapping the Mind
Today a brain scan reveals our thoughts, moods, and memories as clearly as an X-ray reveals our bones. We can actually observe a person's brain registering a joke or experiencing a painful memory.Expand