Error analysis and estimation for the finite volume method with applications to fluid flows
@inproceedings{Jasak1996ErrorAA,
title={Error analysis and estimation for the finite volume method with applications to fluid flows},
author={Hrvoje Jasak},
year={1996}
}The accuracy of numerical simulation algorithms is one of main concerns in modern Computational Fluid Dynamics. Development of new and more accurate mathematical models requires an insight into the problem of numerical errors. In order to construct an estimate of the solution error in Finite Volume calculations, it is first necessary to examine its sources. Discretisation errors can be divided into two groups: errors caused by the discretisation of the solution domain and equation…
Figures and Tables from this paper
figure 3.1 
figure 3.10 
figure 3.11 
figure 3.12 
figure 3.13 
figure 3.14 
figure 3.15 
figure 3.16 
figure 3.17 
figure 3.18 
figure 3.19 
figure 3.2 
figure 3.20 
figure 3.21 
figure 3.22 
figure 3.23 
figure 3.24 
figure 3.25 
figure 3.26 
figure 3.27 
figure 3.28 
figure 3.29 
figure 3.3 
figure 3.30 
figure 3.31 
figure 3.32 
figure 3.33 
figure 3.34 
figure 3.36 
figure 3.37 
figure 3.38 
figure 3.39 
figure 3.4 
figure 3.40 
figure 3.41 
figure 3.42 
figure 3.43 
figure 3.5 
figure 3.6 
figure 3.7 
figure 3.8 
figure 3.9 
figure 4.1 
figure 4.10 
table 4.1 
figure 4.11 
figure 4.12 
figure 4.13 
figure 4.14 
figure 4.15 
figure 4.16 
figure 4.17 
figure 4.18 
figure 4.19 
figure 4.2 
figure 4.20 
table 4.2 
figure 4.21 
figure 4.22 
figure 4.23 
figure 4.24 
figure 4.25 
figure 4.26 
figure 4.27 
figure 4.28 
figure 4.29 
figure 4.3 
figure 4.30 
table 4.3 
figure 4.31 
figure 4.32 
figure 4.33 
figure 4.34 
figure 4.35 
figure 4.36 
figure 4.37 
figure 4.38 
figure 4.4 
table 4.4 
figure 4.5 
figure 4.6 
figure 4.7 
figure 4.8 
figure 4.9 
figure 5.1 
figure 5.10 
figure 5.11 
figure 5.12 
figure 5.13 
figure 5.14 
figure 5.15 
figure 5.16 
figure 5.17 
figure 5.18 
figure 5.19 
figure 5.2 
figure 5.20 
figure 5.21 
figure 5.22 
figure 5.23 
figure 5.24 
figure 5.25 
figure 5.26 
figure 5.27 
figure 5.28 
figure 5.29 
figure 5.3 
figure 5.30 
figure 5.31 
figure 5.32 
figure 5.33 
figure 5.34 
figure 5.35 
figure 5.4 
figure 5.5 
figure 5.6 
figure 5.7 
figure 5.8 
figure 5.9 
figure 6.1 
figure 6.10 
table 6.1 
figure 6.100 
figure 6.101 
figure 6.102 
figure 6.103 
figure 6.104 
figure 6.105 
figure 6.106 
figure 6.107 
figure 6.108 
figure 6.109 
figure 6.11 
figure 6.110 
figure 6.111 
figure 6.112 
figure 6.113 
figure 6.114 
figure 6.115 
figure 6.116 
figure 6.117 
figure 6.118 
figure 6.119 
figure 6.12 
figure 6.120 
figure 6.121 
figure 6.122 
figure 6.123 
figure 6.124 
figure 6.125 
figure 6.126 
figure 6.127 
figure 6.128 
figure 6.129 
figure 6.13 
figure 6.130 
figure 6.131 
figure 6.132 
figure 6.133 
figure 6.134 
figure 6.135 
figure 6.136 
figure 6.137 
figure 6.138 
figure 6.139 
figure 6.14 
figure 6.140 
figure 6.141 
figure 6.142 
figure 6.143 
figure 6.144 
figure 6.145 
figure 6.146 
figure 6.147 
figure 6.148 
figure 6.149 
figure 6.15 
figure 6.150 
figure 6.151 
figure 6.152 
figure 6.153 
figure 6.154 
figure 6.155 
figure 6.156 
figure 6.157 
figure 6.158 
figure 6.159 
figure 6.16 
figure 6.160 
figure 6.161 
figure 6.162 
figure 6.163 
figure 6.164 
figure 6.165 
figure 6.166 
figure 6.17 
figure 6.18 
figure 6.19 
figure 6.2 
figure 6.20 
table 6.2 
figure 6.21 
figure 6.22 
figure 6.23 
figure 6.24 
figure 6.25 
figure 6.26 
figure 6.27 
figure 6.28 
figure 6.29 
figure 6.3 
figure 6.30 
table 6.3 
figure 6.31 
figure 6.32 
figure 6.33 
figure 6.34 
figure 6.35 
figure 6.36 
figure 6.37 
figure 6.38 
figure 6.39 
figure 6.4 
figure 6.40 
table 6.4 
figure 6.41 
figure 6.42 
figure 6.43 
figure 6.44 
figure 6.45 
figure 6.46 
figure 6.47 
figure 6.48 
figure 6.49 
figure 6.5 
figure 6.50 
table 6.5 
figure 6.51 
figure 6.52 
figure 6.53 
figure 6.54 
figure 6.55 
figure 6.56 
figure 6.57 
figure 6.58 
figure 6.59 
figure 6.6 
figure 6.60 
table 6.6 
figure 6.61 
figure 6.62 
figure 6.63 
figure 6.64 
figure 6.65 
figure 6.66 
figure 6.67 
figure 6.68 
figure 6.69 
figure 6.7 
figure 6.70 
figure 6.71 
figure 6.72 
figure 6.73 
figure 6.74 
figure 6.75 
figure 6.76 
figure 6.77 
figure 6.78 
figure 6.79 
figure 6.8 
figure 6.80 
figure 6.81 
figure 6.82 
figure 6.83 
figure 6.84 
figure 6.85 
figure 6.86 
figure 6.87 
figure 6.88 
figure 6.89 
figure 6.9 
figure 6.90 
figure 6.91 
figure 6.92 
figure 6.93 
figure 6.94 
figure 6.95 
figure 6.96 
figure 6.97 
figure 6.98 
figure 6.99
1,420 Citations
A-posteriori error estimation using higher moments in computational fluid dynamics
- Environmental Science
- 2015
In industrial situations time is expensive and simulation accuracy is not always investigated because it requires grid refinement studies or other time consuming methods. With this in mind the goal…
Decomposition model for naval hydrodynamic applications, Part I: Computational method
- Computer Science
- 2016
A critical analysis of some popular methods for the discretisation of the gradient operator in finite volume methods
- Computer Science
- 2016
Results reveal that the zeroth-order accuracy of the DT gradient is inherited by the FVM as a whole, and the discretisation error does not decrease with grid refinement, as well as the use of alternative, consistent, DT gradient schemes, including a new iterative scheme that makes the common DT gradient consistent at almost no extra cost.
Extension of the Local Problem Error Estimate to the Finite Volume Discretisation
- Mathematics
- 1998
Out of the wide range of a-posteriori error estimates for the Finite Element Method (FEM) of discretisation, the group of estimates based on the element residual seems to be the most popular. One…
Boundedness-Preserving Implicit Correction of Mesh-Induced Errors for VoF Based Heat and Mass Transfer
- Computer ScienceJ. Comput. Phys.
- 2018
A consistent discretization of the single-field two-phase momentum convection term for the unstructured finite volume Level Set / Front Tracking method
- Physics
- 2021
We propose the ρLENT method, an extension of the unstructured Level Set / Front Tracking (LENT) method [1, 2], based on the collocated Finite Volume equation discretization, that recovers exact…
POD-Galerkin method for finite volume approximation of Navier–Stokes and RANS equations
- Engineering
- 2016
R-parameter: A local truncation error based adaptive framework for finite volume compressible flow solvers
- Computer Science, Mathematics
- 2009
A collocated unstructured finite volume Level Set / Front Tracking method for two-phase flows with large density-ratios
- Physics
- 2021
We propose the ρLENT method, an extension of the unstructured Level Set / Front Tracking (LENT) method [1, 2], based on the collocated Finite Volume equation discretization, that recovers exact…
References
SHOWING 1-10 OF 89 REFERENCES
A global approach to error estimation and physical diagnostics in multidimensional computational fluid dynamics
- Physics
- 1993
An approach for simultaneously assessing numerical accuracy and extracting physical information from multidimensional calculations of complex (engineering) flows is proposed and demonstrated. The…
IMPROVED FINITE-DIFFERENCE METHODS BASED ON A CRITICAL EVALUATION OF THE APPROXIMATION ERRORS
- Computer Science
- 1979
Storage and computing time requirements for a new sparse matrix solver, which was used in the current study to simultaneously solve for stream function and vorticity, are presented.
Towards the Ultimate Conservative Difference Scheme
- Mathematics
- 1997
A method of second-order accuracy is described for integrating the equations of ideal compressible flow. The method is based on the integral conservation laws and is dissipative, so that it can be…
Evaluation and Comparison of Bounding Techniques for Convection-Diffusion Problems
- Physics
- 1993
The effects of bounding the skew upwind and the second-order upwind discretization schemes for the convection terms in convection-diffusion transport equations have been studied. Earlier studies…
Structured and unstructured grid adaptation schemes for numerical modeling of field problems
- Computer Science
- 1994
Upwind Second-Order Difference Schemes and Applications in Aerodynamic Flows
- Mathematics
- 1976
Explicit second-order upwind difference schemes in combination with spatially symmetric schemes can produce larger stability bounds and better numerical resolution than symmetric schemes alone.…
Numerical solution of the Euler equations by finite volume methods using Runge Kutta time stepping schemes
- Physics
- 1981
A new combination of a finite volume discretization in conjunction with carefully designed dissipative terms of third order, and a Runge Kutta time stepping scheme, is shown to yield an effective…