Erroneous analyses of interactions in neuroscience: a problem of significance

@article{Nieuwenhuis2011ErroneousAO,
  title={Erroneous analyses of interactions in neuroscience: a problem of significance},
  author={Sander Nieuwenhuis and Birte U. Forstmann and Eric-Jan Wagenmakers},
  journal={Nature Neuroscience},
  year={2011},
  volume={14},
  pages={1105-1107}
}
In theory, a comparison of two experimental effects requires a statistical test on their difference. In practice, this comparison is often based on an incorrect procedure involving two separate tests in which researchers conclude that effects differ when one effect is significant (P < 0.05) but the other is not (P > 0.05). We reviewed 513 behavioral, systems and cognitive neuroscience articles in five top-ranking journals (Science, Nature, Nature Neuroscience, Neuron and The Journal of… CONTINUE READING
Highly Influential
This paper has highly influenced 14 other papers. REVIEW HIGHLY INFLUENTIAL CITATIONS

From This Paper

Figures, tables, and topics from this paper.

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 245 extracted citations

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…