Erlotinib in previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer.
@article{Shepherd2005ErlotinibIP,
title={Erlotinib in previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer.},
author={Frances A. Shepherd and J Rodrigues Pereira and Tudor Eliade Ciuleanu and Eng Huat Tan and Vera Hirsh and Sumitra Thongprasert and Daniel Campos and Savitree Maoleekoonpiroj and Michael Smylie and Renato G Martins and Maximiliano van Kooten and Mircea Dediu and Brian P. Findlay and Dongsheng Tu and Dianne B. Johnston and Andrea Bezjak and Gary M. Clark and P. Moreno Santabarbara and Lesley Seymour},
journal={The New England journal of medicine},
year={2005},
volume={353 2},
pages={
123-32
}
}BACKGROUND
We conducted a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial to determine whether the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor erlotinib prolongs survival in non-small-cell lung cancer after the failure of first-line or second-line chemotherapy.
METHODS
Patients with stage IIIB or IV non-small-cell lung cancer, with performance status from 0 to 3, were eligible if they had received one or two prior chemotherapy regimens. The patients were stratified according to center…
3,930 Citations
A Phase II Study of Erlotinib in Patients with Previously Treated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
- Medicine, Biology
- 2014
Elotinib was found to be effective for Japanese patients with previously treated NSCLC in clinical practice and common adverse events were tolerable skin toxicities, diarrhea, and stomatitis.
Phase II study of everolimus-erlotinib in previously treated patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.
- Medicine, BiologyAnnals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology
- 2014
Everolimus 5 mg/ day plus erlotinib 150 mg/day was not considered sufficiently efficacious per the predefined study criteria and the combination does not warrant further investigation based on increased toxicity and the lack of substantial improvement in disease stabilization.
Erlotinib: small-molecule targeted therapy in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer.
- Medicine, BiologyClinical therapeutics
- 2005
Randomized phase II study of gefitinib versus erlotinib in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer who failed previous chemotherapy.
- Medicine, BiologyLung cancer
- 2012
Erlotinib as maintenance therapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a pooled analysis of three randomized trials
- MedicineAnti-cancer drugs
- 2011
The addition of maintenance erlotinib significantly improves PFS and OS in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer who had not progressed after four cycles of first-line chemotherapy.
Phase II trial of cetuximab in patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer.
- Medicine, BiologyJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology
- 2006
Although the response rate with single-agent cetuximab in this heavily pretreated patient population with advanced NSCLC was only 4.5%, the disease control rates and overall survival seem comparable to that of pemetrexed, docetaxel, and erlotinib in similar groups of patients.
Erlotinib monotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: an effective approach with low toxicity.
- Medicine, BiologyAnticancer research
- 2008
Erlotinib is effective and well tolerated in pretreated patients with advanced NSCLC and a good performance status and its impact on survival is assessed.
First-line erlotinib in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer unsuitable for chemotherapy (TOPICAL): a double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial
- MedicineThe Lancet. Oncology
- 2012
Pemetrexed versus Gefitinib versus Erlotinib in Previously Treated Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
- Medicine, BiologyThe Korean journal of internal medicine
- 2010
Both oral epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR TKIs) had comparable efficacy and safety and the superior PFS and OS of EGFR TkIs with more favorable baseline clinical characteristics than those of pemetrexed suggest the impact of baseline clinicopathological factors.
References
SHOWING 1-10 OF 41 REFERENCES
Determinants of tumor response and survival with erlotinib in patients with non--small-cell lung cancer.
- Medicine, BiologyJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology
- 2004
Erlotinib was active and well tolerated in this patient population, and further clinical development is clearly warranted; cutaneous rash seems to be a surrogate marker of clinical benefit, but this finding should be confirmed in ongoing and future studies.
Multi-institutional randomized phase II trial of gefitinib for previously treated patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (The IDEAL 1 Trial) [corrected].
- Medicine, BiologyJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology
- 2003
Gefitinib showed clinically meaningful antitumor activity and provided symptom relief as second- and third-line treatment in patients with pretreated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.
Randomized Phase III Trial of Docetaxel Versus Vinorelbine or Ifosfamide in Patients With Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Previously Treated With Platinum-Containing Chemotherapy Regimens
- Medicine
- 2000
Patients who received docetaxel had a longer time to progression and a greater progression-free survival at 26 weeks and the 1-year survival was significantly greater with D75 than with the control treat...
Prospective randomized trial of docetaxel versus best supportive care in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy.
- MedicineJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology
- 2000
Treatment with docetaxel is associated with significant prolongation of survival, and at a dose of 75 mg/m(2), the benefits of docetAXel therapy outweigh the risks.
TRIBUTE - A phase III trial of erlotinib HCl (OSI-774) combined with carboplatin and paclitaxel (CP) chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
- MedicineJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology
- 2004
Eerlotinib combined with carboplatin and paclitaxel chemotherapy did not confer a survival advantage over carboplarin and pac litaxel alone in pts with previously untreated advanced NSCLC and TTSP results to be presented.
Gefitinib in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase III trial--INTACT 1.
- Medicine, BiologyJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology
- 2004
Gefitinib in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced NSCLC did not have improved efficacy over gemcitABine and cascplatin alone, and the reasons for this remain obscure and require further preclinical testing.
Results of a phase III trial of erlotinib (OSI-774) combined with cisplatin and gemcitabine (GC) chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
- Medicine, Biology
- 2004
TALENT was a placebo-controlled study in patients with previously untreated advanced NSCLC to receive erlotinib at 150mg/d or placebo (PBO) with 6 cycles of gemcitabine and cisplatin followed by monotherapy, with primary endpoint duration of survival.
Efficacy of gefitinib, an inhibitor of the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase, in symptomatic patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a randomized trial.
- MedicineJAMA
- 2003
Gefitinib, a well-tolerated oral EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor, improved disease-related symptoms and induced radiographic tumor regressions in patients with NSCLC persisting after chemotherapy.
Gefitinib in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase III trial--INTACT 2.
- Medicine, BiologyJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology
- 2004
This large, placebo-controlled trial confirmed the favorable gefitinib safety profile observed in phase I and II monotherapy trials and showed no added benefit in survival, time to progression, response rate (TTP), or RR compared with standard chemotherapy alone.




