Equality Talk: Antisubordination and Anticlassification Values in Constitutional Struggles Over Brown

@article{Siegel2004EqualityTA,
  title={Equality Talk: Antisubordination and Anticlassification Values in Constitutional Struggles Over Brown},
  author={Reva B. Siegel},
  journal={Harvard Law Review},
  year={2004},
  volume={117},
  pages={1470}
}
When Brown v. Board of EducationI prohibited racial segregation in public education, it inaugurated a great debate about equal citizenship and federalism that spanned the second half of the twentieth century. The case reverberates with conflict, with stories about the possibilities and limits of constitutional law. This Article explores the relation of constitutional principle and constitutional politics in the ways we talk about the decision's meaning. It shows how convictions about the… Expand
Preventing Balkanization or Facilitating Racial Domination: A Critique of the New Equal Protection
The Supreme Court requires that equal protection plaintiffs prove defendants acted with discriminatory intent. The intent rule has insulated from judicial invalidation numerous policies thatExpand
Identity conflicts, human rights and the crisis of multiculturalism in Europe: from politics to the courts
Across Europe, courts play a central role in dealing with identity-driven conflicts across entrenched socio-cultural divides. Many of these controversies are seemingly religious disputes, involvingExpand
Reconstructing the Race-Sex Analogy
ABSTRACT In the standard account, American sex equality law rests on a partial and imperfect analogy to race, developed in the 1970s by feminists intent on establishing formal equality between menExpand
The Betrayal of Brown v. Board of Education: How Brown's Promise is Unfulfilled and What it Says About the Continuing Problem of Race in Education
Author(s): Tran, Hoang Vu | Advisor(s): Leonardo, Zeus | Abstract: As we stand on the cusp of another Supreme Court opinion concerning the use of racial considerations in education from Fisher v.Expand
The Miscegenation/Same-Sex Marriage Analogy: What Can We Learn from Legal History?
  • J. Novkov
  • Engineering
  • Law & Social Inquiry
  • 2008
It has become commonplace among historically inclined legal scholars to look to the history of the United States’ elimination of bans on mixed-race sexual relationships for guidance about the recentExpand
Abortion and the Constitutional Right (Not) to Procreate
With the growing use of assisted reproductive technology (“ART”), courts have to reconcile competing rights to seek and avoid procreation. Often, in imagining the boundaries of these rights, judgesExpand
A Strategic and Consequentialist Perspective: Affirmative Action as an Instrument for Deracializing American Society
The objections to the two main justifications for affirmative action made in the first two chapters are not meant to suggest that another, more promising line of argument is unavailable. In thisExpand
Remembering Massive Resistance to School Desegregation
The historian Charles Payne has described Brown v. Board of Education as “a milestone in search of something to signify.” Widely hailed as a symbol of Jim Crow's demise, the case is popularlyExpand
Remembering How To Do Equality
Decades ago, equal protection law helped bring about great transformations in the status of African Americans, women, and other subordinated groups. Today, constitutional equality doctrine is mostlyExpand
Race, Law & Inequality, Fifty Years after the Civil Rights Era
Over the last several decades, law and social science scholars have documented persistent racial inequality in the United States. This review focuses on mechanisms to explain this persistent pattern.Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...