Epistemic democracy : generalizing the Condorcet jury theorem

@article{List2001EpistemicD,
  title={Epistemic democracy : generalizing the Condorcet jury theorem},
  author={C. List and R. Goodin},
  journal={Journal of Political Philosophy},
  year={2001},
  volume={9},
  pages={277-306}
}
This item was published as 'Appendix 3: An Implication of the k-option Condorcet jury mechanism for the probability of cycles' in List and Goodin (2001) http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/705/. Standard results suggest that the probability of cycles should increase as the number of options increases and also as the number of individuals increases. These results are, however, premised on a so-called "impartial culture" assumption: any logically possible preference ordering is assumed to be as likely to be… Expand
415 Citations

Tables from this paper

Democracy's Wisdom: An Aristotelian Middle Way for Collective Judgment
  • J. Ober
  • Sociology
  • American Political Science Review
  • 2013
  • 36
  • Highly Influenced
  • PDF
The Epistemic View of Belief Merging: Can We Track the Truth?
  • 10
  • Highly Influenced
  • PDF
Un point de vue épistémique sur la fusion de croyances : l'identification du monde réel
  • Highly Influenced
  • PDF
Political Polupragmones: Busybody Athenians, Meddlesome Citizenship, and Epistemic Democracy in Classical Athens
  • Highly Influenced
Every Team Deserves a Second Chance: Identifying When Things Go Wrong (Student Abstract Version)
  • 17
  • Highly Influenced
  • PDF
Beyond epistemic democracy : the identification and pooling of information by groups of political agents
  • Highly Influenced
  • PDF
Epistemic approaches to deliberative democracy
  • 4
  • Highly Influenced
  • PDF
Every team deserves a second chance: an extended study on predicting team performance
  • 1
  • Highly Influenced
  • PDF
HOW TO CONDORCET A GOLDMAN
  • Highly Influenced
Independence and interdependence: Lessons from the hive
  • Highly Influenced
  • PDF
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 73 REFERENCES
An Experimental Study of Jury Decision Rules
  • 276
  • PDF
In Defense of Unanimous Jury Verdicts: Mistrials, Communication, and Strategic Voting
  • 281
Jury Verdicts and Preference Diversity
  • 58
  • PDF
Unlikelihood of Condorcet’s paradox in a large society
  • A. Tangian
  • Economics, Computer Science
  • Soc. Choice Welf.
  • 2000
  • 58
Introduction. Pp. 1-26 in Democracy, Accountability and Representation
  • Introduction. Pp. 1-26 in Democracy, Accountability and Representation
  • 1999
The dignity of legislation
  • 266
Rational choice and the Condorcet jury theorem
  • 105
Beyond fairness and deliberation: the epistemic dimension of democratic authority
  • Pp. 173-204 in Deliberative Democracy, ed. James Bohman and Willian Rehg. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
  • 1997
...
1
2
3
4
5
...