Epistemic Permissiveness
@inproceedings{WhiteEpistemicP, title={Epistemic Permissiveness}, author={R. White} }
A rational person doesn't believe just anything. There are limits on what it is rational to believe. How wide are these limits? That's the main question that interests me here. But a secondary question immediately arises: What factors impose these limits? A first stab is to say that one's evidence determines what it is epistemically permissible for one to believe. Many will claim that there are further, non-evidentiary factors relevant to the epistemic rationality of belief. I will be ignoring… Expand
134 Citations
Accuracy and Ur-Prior Conditionalization Forthcoming in The Review of Symbolic Logic
- 2018
- Highly Influenced
- PDF
Accuracy and UR-Prior Conditionalization
- Philosophy, Computer Science
- Rev. Symb. Log.
- 2019
- 3
- Highly Influenced
- PDF
References
SHOWING 1-10 OF 12 REFERENCES
Philosophical Perspectives
- Philosophical Perspectives
- 2001
The Empirical StanceIt is Wrong, Always, Everywhere, and for Anyone, to Believe Anything, Upon Insufficient Evidence
- ———
- 1996
Bayes or Bust? Cambridge, Mass
- Bayes or Bust? Cambridge, Mass
- 1992