Ensuring the Quality, Fairness, and Integrity of Journal Peer Review: A Possible Role of Editors

@article{Resnik2016EnsuringTQ,
  title={Ensuring the Quality, Fairness, and Integrity of Journal Peer Review: A Possible Role of Editors},
  author={D. Resnik and S. Elmore},
  journal={Science and Engineering Ethics},
  year={2016},
  volume={22},
  pages={169-188}
}
  • D. Resnik, S. Elmore
  • Published 2016
  • Psychology, Computer Science, Medicine
  • Science and Engineering Ethics
A growing body of literature has identified potential problems that can compromise the quality, fairness, and integrity of journal peer review, including inadequate review, inconsistent reviewer reports, reviewer biases, and ethical transgressions by reviewers. We examine the evidence concerning these problems and discuss proposed reforms, including double-blind and open review. Regardless of the outcome of additional research or attempts at reforming the system, it is clear that editors are… Expand
How are Editors Selected, Recruited and Approved?
A Method for Improving the Integrity of Peer Review
Is Biomedical Research Protected from Predatory Reviewers?
The ethics of reporting all the results of clinical trials
Evaluating the Pros and Cons of Different Peer Review Policies via Simulation
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 86 REFERENCES
Quality and Peer Review of Research: An Adjudicating Role for Editors
  • D. Newton
  • Psychology, Medicine
  • Accountability in research
  • 2010
Peer review for journals: Evidence on quality control, fairness, and innovation
Bias in peer review
Perceptions of Ethical Problems with Scientific Journal Peer Review: An Exploratory Study
Letting the daylight in: Reviewing the reviewers and other ways to maximize transparency in science
Open peer review: A randomised controlled trial
...
1
2
3
4
5
...