Enforcing (But Not Defending) 'Unconstitutional' Laws
@article{Huq2012EnforcingN, title={Enforcing (But Not Defending) 'Unconstitutional' Laws}, author={Aziz Huq}, journal={Virginia Law Review}, year={2012}, volume={98}, pages={1001} }
When should the executive decline to defend in court a federal law it has determined to be unconstitutional, yet still enforce that same statute against third parties? The question is prompted by the Obama administration’s decision to enforce, but not defend in federal court, Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (“DOMA”). But the DOMA Section 3 decision is not the first time the executive has bifurcated the enforcement of a statute from its defense before the bench. The practice of… CONTINUE READING
69 Citations
The Letter of the Law: Administrative Discretion and Obama’s Domestic Unilateralism
- Sociology
- 2014
- 2
- PDF
Constitutional Law, Moral Judgment, and the Supreme Court as Super-Legislature
- Political Science
- 2015
- 11
- PDF
Sued If You Do, Sued If You Don’t: Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act as a Defense to Race-Conscious Districting
- Sociology
- 2015
- 6
- PDF
References
SHOWING 1-10 OF 16 REFERENCES
The Sex Side of Civil Liberties: United States v. Dennett and the Changing Face of Free Speech
- Sociology
- 2012
- 24
- PDF
An FDA for Financial Innovation: Applying the Insurable Interest Doctrine to 21st Century Financial Markets
- Economics
- 2012
- 69
- PDF